"The officer missed more than he hit" yeah but those hits were in just the right spots
Pensacola Discussion Forum
Go to page : 1, 2
no stress wrote:Anybody that believes this load of horseshit has obviously never done stress firing practice. If officer Wilson was able to shoot that strong arm robbery suspect at 148 feet multiple times then it had to be divine intervention, which meant that even God hated that fat overgrown motherfucker. Good riddance
Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
How do you know if the parent on the way to the babysitter didn't have stop suddenly in traffic exerting the force on the child's brain?
Sal wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
How do you know if the parent on the way to the babysitter didn't have stop suddenly in traffic exerting the force on the child's brain?
The scenarios you and SO describe are unlikely to the point of preposterousness.
Sal wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
How do you know if the parent on the way to the babysitter didn't have stop suddenly in traffic exerting the force on the child's brain?
The scenarios you and SO describe are unlikely to the point of preposterousness.
KarlRove wrote:Wordslinger, you haven't accounted for the gun powder residue on Michael Brown's hands. That occurs much closer than 148 feet. Sorry, but your lies are just that, lies.
Vikingwoman wrote:Sal wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
How do you know if the parent on the way to the babysitter didn't have stop suddenly in traffic exerting the force on the child's brain?
The scenarios you and SO describe are unlikely to the point of preposterousness.
Why are they preposterous? If a human can shake a baby up and down that hard then why can't the force of a car pitch the child's head violently forward disengaging the brain? Have you ever seen those test crashes at 40 mph w/ dummies?
Vikingwoman wrote:Sal wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
How do you know if the parent on the way to the babysitter didn't have stop suddenly in traffic exerting the force on the child's brain?
The scenarios you and SO describe are unlikely to the point of preposterousness.
Why are they preposterous? If a human can shake a baby up and down that hard then why can't the force of a car pitch the child's head violently forward disengaging the brain? Have you ever seen those test crashes at 40 mph w/ dummies?
Floridatexan wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Sal wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
How do you know if the parent on the way to the babysitter didn't have stop suddenly in traffic exerting the force on the child's brain?
The scenarios you and SO describe are unlikely to the point of preposterousness.
Why are they preposterous? If a human can shake a baby up and down that hard then why can't the force of a car pitch the child's head violently forward disengaging the brain? Have you ever seen those test crashes at 40 mph w/ dummies?
Why the hell are you talking about the baby on this thread? This thread was supposed to be about Michael Brown. In fact, I find your graphic detail disgusting...have since it happened, because it almost coincided with my grandson's first birthday. And because you won't shut up about it. Why are you so invested in exonerating the police? And why, again, are you so intent upon demonizing black victims of violent crime?
no stress wrote:Ha ha ha!! Boooyaaa!!!
KarlRove wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:Wordslinger wrote:KarlRove wrote:Wordslinger wrote:Someone decides to measure the distance, and their effort shows that Brown was shot and killed 148' from Officer Wilson's position.
If those findings are true, how in hell can anyone other than Pacedog and Herr Markle, our resident Nazi, justify the cop's reason to shoot to kill?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/20/1346374/-BREAKING-VIDEO-Police-Lied-Mike-Brown-was-killed-148-feet-away-from-Darren-Wilson-s-SUV?detail=email
Six shots at nearly 50 yards each? Geez. Hire that dude and let him take care of ISIS by himself.
My ex is a marksmanship instructor with the SRSO, she can't hit six shots from that distance, much less a kill shot.
So your ex is a bad shot -- we're talking just 50 yards -- I've shot accurately at that distance with a .45, a .357 and even a .22 mag. And I regularly see handgun enthusiasts shoot at that distance at the Quintette Road range. I've killed wild boar in California with a handgun at 40 yards. But so what? Your ex isn't involved in Brown's killing and neither was I. The point of the distance measurement destroys the killer cop's alibi that he shot in fear of his life. On that alone, Wilson is guilty of 2nd degree murder or manslaughter.
Whether Brown was 35 feet or 148 feet from Wilson when he was gunned down, Brown had no firearm and was absolutely no believable life threat to the killer cop.
Reality.
145 feet is 75 yards not 50 yards.
Joani
3 feet equals one yard
145 feet divided by three is 48.3 yards
Wordslinger wrote:KarlRove wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:Wordslinger wrote:KarlRove wrote:Wordslinger wrote:Someone decides to measure the distance, and their effort shows that Brown was shot and killed 148' from Officer Wilson's position.
If those findings are true, how in hell can anyone other than Pacedog and Herr Markle, our resident Nazi, justify the cop's reason to shoot to kill?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/20/1346374/-BREAKING-VIDEO-Police-Lied-Mike-Brown-was-killed-148-feet-away-from-Darren-Wilson-s-SUV?detail=email
Six shots at nearly 50 yards each? Geez. Hire that dude and let him take care of ISIS by himself.
My ex is a marksmanship instructor with the SRSO, she can't hit six shots from that distance, much less a kill shot.
So your ex is a bad shot -- we're talking just 50 yards -- I've shot accurately at that distance with a .45, a .357 and even a .22 mag. And I regularly see handgun enthusiasts shoot at that distance at the Quintette Road range. I've killed wild boar in California with a handgun at 40 yards. But so what? Your ex isn't involved in Brown's killing and neither was I. The point of the distance measurement destroys the killer cop's alibi that he shot in fear of his life. On that alone, Wilson is guilty of 2nd degree murder or manslaughter.
Whether Brown was 35 feet or 148 feet from Wilson when he was gunned down, Brown had no firearm and was absolutely no believable life threat to the killer cop.
Reality.
145 feet is 75 yards not 50 yards.
Joani
3 feet equals one yard
145 feet divided by three is 48.3 yards
Thanks, Joni ..
Joanimaroni wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Sal wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
How do you know if the parent on the way to the babysitter didn't have stop suddenly in traffic exerting the force on the child's brain?
The scenarios you and SO describe are unlikely to the point of preposterousness.
Why are they preposterous? If a human can shake a baby up and down that hard then why can't the force of a car pitch the child's head violently forward disengaging the brain? Have you ever seen those test crashes at 40 mph w/ dummies?
Car seats!
Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Sal wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:2seaoat wrote:I will only be happy when police officers are not longer treated as a protected class and given privileges that other ordinary citizens do not share. Just let all officers of the law abide by the law. Mrs. Lowery never got invited to the Grand Jury room to tell her side of the story, and will spend a year in jail before having an opportunity to be found not guilty of the alleged crime.......a parent inadvertently putting the child in their car seat hits the child's head on the car ceiling in just the right angle to cause damage to the child's brain stem, but did Mrs. Lowery get to enjoy protected status? No, she did not even though she was an officer with the volunteer fire department which served the people.....and therein lies the problem.....the protected class is wagging the dog.
Really, Seaoat?
Bumps the child's head on the ceiling of the car....in just the right angle to cause a massive brain injury and blindness. An injury so severe that when a portion of the skull is removed in surgery his damaged brain herniates out of his skull....because of over-whelming inter- cranial pressure. So much damage to the brain.....tissue from the brain had to be removed. Yet no skull fracture or any external injury to the head and neck area was found...none. Gosh it must have been that little bump on the celing of the car at just the right, exact, percise angle! Had to be.....because it could not possibly have been caused by an acquiantance of yours......never.
How do you know if the parent on the way to the babysitter didn't have stop suddenly in traffic exerting the force on the child's brain?
The scenarios you and SO describe are unlikely to the point of preposterousness.
Why are they preposterous? If a human can shake a baby up and down that hard then why can't the force of a car pitch the child's head violently forward disengaging the brain? Have you ever seen those test crashes at 40 mph w/ dummies?
Car seats!
Car seats? They don't hold a baby's head.
Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is widespread damage to nerve cells that make up brain tissue. When the brain is being thrown at high speed in all kinds of directions, the nerve cells twist and turn, causing brain cells to shear and tear. When nerve cells are damaged in this way, they lose their ability to communicate with each other, so signals cannot pass through.
High speed is often a factor with DAI - often caused by car or motorbike accidents, falls from great heights or violent assaults. This is also the type of injury babies get suffer they are shaken violently (called shaken baby syndrome). DAI is very serious as damaged nerve cells cannot be repaired, and depending on where and how much damage is done, the person may never fully recover and may be left with severe impairments.
Wordslinger wrote:no stress wrote:Ha ha ha!! Boooyaaa!!!
For those of us who think a big mouthed actor who at one time was a marine, is now just a big-mouthed actor who glorifies being big-mouthed and crude, merits all the praise and respect smarter people have for such infantile, imitation macho bullshit.
Your imitation, plastic tough-guy persona, your language skills, and your obvious idolization of non-thinking macho crapola, exemplified by your avatar, makes almost anything you're trying to communicate irrelevant. Why don't you take up professional wrestling?
Semper Fi asshole.
God dreams youre so fucking stupid! read his post very slowly and by the grace of God ,just maybe you will realize that he is talking about the guy in my avatar. For fucks sake go back to night school and at least get your GED where you can walk and chew gum in public........and wash them skanky ass feet!Vikingwoman wrote:Wordslinger wrote:no stress wrote:Ha ha ha!! Boooyaaa!!!
For those of us who think a big mouthed actor who at one time was a marine, is now just a big-mouthed actor who glorifies being big-mouthed and crude, merits all the praise and respect smarter people have for such infantile, imitation macho bullshit.
Your imitation, plastic tough-guy persona, your language skills, and your obvious idolization of non-thinking macho crapola, exemplified by your avatar, makes almost anything you're trying to communicate irrelevant. Why don't you take up professional wrestling?
Semper Fi asshole.
Who was an actor? No stress? LOL! That's got to be a joke?
Vikingwoman wrote:Really? I know someone who's child's neck broke from going forward and backward in a car seat during an accident.
Joanimaroni wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Really? I know someone who's child's neck broke from going forward and backward in a car seat during an accident.
Car accident or slamming on brakes?
Vikingwoman wrote:Joanimaroni wrote:Vikingwoman wrote:Really? I know someone who's child's neck broke from going forward and backward in a car seat during an accident.
Car accident or slamming on brakes?
Did you see where I said accident already in the post?
Go to page : 1, 2
Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Michael Brown's body was 148' from Daryl Wilson's squad car!
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum