Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

The pro-democrat Communist News Network (CNN) runs a hatchet job piece on Romney just to make Obama look good.

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/08/opinion/rothkopf-campaign-tactics/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

Sal

Sal
Buttman wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/08/opinion/rothkopf-campaign-tactics/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

I'm having an awfully hard time mustering the moral outrage to join in the howls of protests over Harry's hammering of Willard over his tax returns. Not after Vince Foster, and White Water, and Blowjobgate, and Birthermania, and now School Records. Harry has nothing to lose. The only reason he's still in the Senate is because the teahadists saw fit to nominate a nutjob like Sharon Engle, and as far as I can tell, he has no other political ambitions beyond majority leader. I say, "Give 'em hell, Harry!" Because unlike birth certificates and school records, Willard is the first nominee for POTUS in my lifetimewho is refusing to share tax records with the American people. Put up, or STFU.

Guest


Guest
Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Sal

Sal
nochain wrote:Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Romney's father, George Romney, who made a failed bid for president as a Republican candidate in 1968, released 12 years of tax returns.

President Barack Obama has released 12 years of tax returns.

Willard needs to put up or STFU.

Guest


Guest
salinsky wrote:
nochain wrote:Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Romney's father, George Romney, who made a failed bid for president as a Republican candidate in 1968, released 12 years of tax returns.

President Barack Obama has released 12 years of tax returns.

Willard needs to put up or STFU.


Whoopty do. Kerry released a few but the money bags of the family did not. Who cares?

Guest


Guest
nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:
nochain wrote:Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Romney's father, George Romney, who made a failed bid for president as a Republican candidate in 1968, released 12 years of tax returns.

President Barack Obama has released 12 years of tax returns.

Willard needs to put up or STFU.


Whoopty do. Kerry released a few but the money bags of the family did not. Who cares?

Who cares? Then tell us why you're bitchin about Obama's school records?

Guest


Guest
Dreamsglore wrote:
nochain wrote:
salinsky wrote:
nochain wrote:Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Romney's father, George Romney, who made a failed bid for president as a Republican candidate in 1968, released 12 years of tax returns.

President Barack Obama has released 12 years of tax returns.

Willard needs to put up or STFU.


Whoopty do. Kerry released a few but the money bags of the family did not. Who cares?

Who cares? Then tell us why you're bitchin about Obama's school records?

I'm not. You are clueless as usual.

Slicef18

Slicef18
Harry Reid is doing exactly what he's supposed to be doing, and it's called politics. Karl Rove is doing the very same thing for the Republican's, which sends some Democrats complaining. It's the way politics is allowed to be played here in America. The difference between the professional politician and the general public is this. When it's over, the professional politicians slap each other on the back and go have dinner together. The general public piss & moan about it and spend months and years declaring they were cheated by dishonest people on the other side who don't play by the rules. The professionals get it and move on.

See:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI

NaNook

NaNook
[quote="salinsky"]
nochain wrote:Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Romney's father, George Romney, who made a failed bid for president as a Republican candidate in 1968, released 12 years of tax returns.

President Barack Obama has released 12 years of tax returns.

Willard needs to put up or STFU.
[/quote

Does Obama still have a License to Practice Law?

Slicef18

Slicef18
[quote="NaNook"]
salinsky wrote:
nochain wrote:Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Romney's father, George Romney, who made a failed bid for president as a Republican candidate in 1968, released 12 years of tax returns.

President Barack Obama has released 12 years of tax returns.

Willard needs to put up or STFU.
[/quote

Does Obama still have a License to Practice Law?


"Does Obama still have a License to Practice Law?"

Barack "voluntarily retired" his law license.
Michelle "voluntarily inactive" her license.

VectorMan

VectorMan
Hatchet job?

It would be nice if things worked the way the author of buttman's link would like. I'm all for it. But, alas.....

Bob, I'm sure the title of this thread is YOUR OWN FORM of sarcasm. Considering the content of the opinion piece. On the other hand, I think you know what I think about the liberal media's Obama love fest.

othershoe1030

othershoe1030
salinsky wrote:
Buttman wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/08/opinion/rothkopf-campaign-tactics/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

I'm having an awfully hard time mustering the moral outrage to join in the howls of protests over Harry's hammering of Willard over his tax returns. Not after Vince Foster, and White Water, and Blowjobgate, and Birthermania, and now School Records. Harry has nothing to lose. The only reason he's still in the Senate is because the teahadists saw fit to nominate a nutjob like Sharon Engle, and as far as I can tell, he has no other political ambitions beyond majority leader. I say, "Give 'em hell, Harry!" Because unlike birth certificates and school records, Willard is the first nominee for POTUS in my lifetimewho is refusing to share tax records with the American people. Put up, or STFU.


Good point about all the smears the Republicans have used against Clinton. Don't forget Swiftboating and the Willie Horton ads. This is the Republican's main play book. The list goes on.

Sure, the right always gripes about strong attacks made by Dems crying foul when Rove and his bunch go at it whole hog. Like the Dems need to play be different rules? Here's a link to the most recent ad blasting the effects of Romney shutting down a steel mill. It tells a real story about real people.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/pro-obama-super-pac-bain-ad.php

Markle

Markle
othershoe1030 wrote:
salinsky wrote:
Buttman wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/08/opinion/rothkopf-campaign-tactics/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

I'm having an awfully hard time mustering the moral outrage to join in the howls of protests over Harry's hammering of Willard over his tax returns. Not after Vince Foster, and White Water, and Blowjobgate, and Birthermania, and now School Records. Harry has nothing to lose. The only reason he's still in the Senate is because the teahadists saw fit to nominate a nutjob like Sharon Engle, and as far as I can tell, he has no other political ambitions beyond majority leader. I say, "Give 'em hell, Harry!" Because unlike birth certificates and school records, Willard is the first nominee for POTUS in my lifetimewho is refusing to share tax records with the American people. Put up, or STFU.


Good point about all the smears the Republicans have used against Clinton. Don't forget Swiftboating and the Willie Horton ads. This is the Republican's main play book. The list goes on.

Sure, the right always gripes about strong attacks made by Dems crying foul when Rove and his bunch go at it whole hog. Like the Dems need to play be different rules? Here's a link to the most recent ad blasting the effects of Romney shutting down a steel mill. It tells a real story about real people.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/pro-obama-super-pac-bain-ad.php

By now you realize that it is a TOTALLY FALSE story, a complete lie from top to bottom demonstrating that there is no level beneath which the hard left Progressives will stoop to slander Mitt Romney.

How much are they paying that guy for that completely false commentary?



Last edited by Markle on 8/10/2012, 1:38 am; edited 1 time in total

Guest


Guest
Markle wrote:
By now you realize that it is a TOTALLY FALSE story, a complete lie from top to bottom demonstrating that there is no level beneath which the hard left Progressives will stoop to slander Mitt Romney.

How much are they paying that guy for that completely false commentary?

Democrats are desperate. They absolutely can not run on obamas record. They have spent 4 years blaming bush and need to divert all attention from Obamas record in order to stand a chance. This AD was complete BS.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan
nochain wrote:Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Yet you continue screaming for Obama's SCHOOL records. (Speaking of shallow public minds.)

Floridatexan

Floridatexan
Markle wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
salinsky wrote:
Buttman wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/08/opinion/rothkopf-campaign-tactics/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

I'm having an awfully hard time mustering the moral outrage to join in the howls of protests over Harry's hammering of Willard over his tax returns. Not after Vince Foster, and White Water, and Blowjobgate, and Birthermania, and now School Records. Harry has nothing to lose. The only reason he's still in the Senate is because the teahadists saw fit to nominate a nutjob like Sharon Engle, and as far as I can tell, he has no other political ambitions beyond majority leader. I say, "Give 'em hell, Harry!" Because unlike birth certificates and school records, Willard is the first nominee for POTUS in my lifetimewho is refusing to share tax records with the American people. Put up, or STFU.


Good point about all the smears the Republicans have used against Clinton. Don't forget Swiftboating and the Willie Horton ads. This is the Republican's main play book. The list goes on.

Sure, the right always gripes about strong attacks made by Dems crying foul when Rove and his bunch go at it whole hog. Like the Dems need to play be different rules? Here's a link to the most recent ad blasting the effects of Romney shutting down a steel mill. It tells a real story about real people.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/pro-obama-super-pac-bain-ad.php

By now you realize that it is a TOTALLY FALSE story, a complete lie from top to bottom demonstrating that there is no level beneath which the hard left Progressives will stoop to slander Mitt Romney.

How much are they paying that guy for that completely false commentary?

Why? Do you need a raise for your completely false commentary?

Guest


Guest
Floridatexan wrote:
nochain wrote:Candidates are not required to release a lifetime of records so why the faux outrage? To take the shallow publics mind off a dismal economy and focus them on a nonissue. This campaign is being guided by sewer rats.

A good history of tax records being released at:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/16/presidential-candidates-have-long-history-of-releasing-tax-returns/

Yet you continue screaming for Obama's SCHOOL records. (Speaking of shallow public minds.)

Show me one place where I said that - you are taking your cues for lying from the Oblamer superpacs and your hero, the Liar-in-Chief Oblamer. And yes, your mind is so shallow it couldn't support mosquito larvae.

Sal

Sal
I have the sneaking suspicion that Harry's anonymous source is all too real and won't be remaining anonymous for long. I'm thinking they're just giving Willard as much rope as he's willing to take, and at the appropriate time (maybe smack dab in the middle of the RNC), the source will reveal himself. He'll probably be a former Bain exec and a fellow member of the Mormon cult, and be very hard for Willard to dismiss.

Markle

Markle
Floridatexan wrote:
Markle wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
salinsky wrote:
Buttman wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/08/opinion/rothkopf-campaign-tactics/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

I'm having an awfully hard time mustering the moral outrage to join in the howls of protests over Harry's hammering of Willard over his tax returns. Not after Vince Foster, and White Water, and Blowjobgate, and Birthermania, and now School Records. Harry has nothing to lose. The only reason he's still in the Senate is because the teahadists saw fit to nominate a nutjob like Sharon Engle, and as far as I can tell, he has no other political ambitions beyond majority leader. I say, "Give 'em hell, Harry!" Because unlike birth certificates and school records, Willard is the first nominee for POTUS in my lifetimewho is refusing to share tax records with the American people. Put up, or STFU.


Good point about all the smears the Republicans have used against Clinton. Don't forget Swiftboating and the Willie Horton ads. This is the Republican's main play book. The list goes on.

Sure, the right always gripes about strong attacks made by Dems crying foul when Rove and his bunch go at it whole hog. Like the Dems need to play be different rules? Here's a link to the most recent ad blasting the effects of Romney shutting down a steel mill. It tells a real story about real people.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/pro-obama-super-pac-bain-ad.php

By now you realize that it is a TOTALLY FALSE story, a complete lie from top to bottom demonstrating that there is no level beneath which the hard left Progressives will stoop to slander Mitt Romney.

How much are they paying that guy for that completely false commentary?

Why? Do you need a raise for your completely false commentary?

Have you finally caught on to the FACT that the ad, by an Obama Super-Pac is a reprehensible lie? Or do you care?

20The pro-democrat Communist News Network (CNN) runs a hatchet job piece on Romney just to make Obama look good. Empty The truth about Mitt on 8/10/2012, 11:22 am

Wordslinger

Wordslinger
Markle wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
salinsky wrote:
Buttman wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/08/opinion/rothkopf-campaign-tactics/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

I'm having an awfully hard time mustering the moral outrage to join in the howls of protests over Harry's hammering of Willard over his tax returns. Not after Vince Foster, and White Water, and Blowjobgate, and Birthermania, and now School Records. Harry has nothing to lose. The only reason he's still in the Senate is because the teahadists saw fit to nominate a nutjob like Sharon Engle, and as far as I can tell, he has no other political ambitions beyond majority leader. I say, "Give 'em hell, Harry!" Because unlike birth certificates and school records, Willard is the first nominee for POTUS in my lifetimewho is refusing to share tax records with the American people. Put up, or STFU.


Good point about all the smears the Republicans have used against Clinton. Don't forget Swiftboating and the Willie Horton ads. This is the Republican's main play book. The list goes on.

Sure, the right always gripes about strong attacks made by Dems crying foul when Rove and his bunch go at it whole hog. Like the Dems need to play be different rules? Here's a link to the most recent ad blasting the effects of Romney shutting down a steel mill. It tells a real story about real people.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/pro-obama-super-pac-bain-ad.php

By now you realize that it is a TOTALLY FALSE story, a complete lie from top to bottom demonstrating that there is no level beneath which the hard left Progressives will stoop to slander Mitt Romney.

How much are they paying that guy for that completely false commentary?

Poor Mitt. Everyone thinks he's an ultrarich elitist who wants to screw the middle class. Everyone's right.

Guest


Guest
salinsky wrote:I have the sneaking suspicion that Harry's anonymous source is all too real and won't be remaining anonymous for long. I'm thinking they're just giving Willard as much rope as he's willing to take, and at the appropriate time (maybe smack dab in the middle of the RNC), the source will reveal himself. He'll probably be a former Bain exec and a fellow member of the Mormon cult, and be very hard for Willard to dismiss.
I heard it was fellow mormon Billionaire John Huntsmans dad, word is that romney hasn't been payin his fair share to the church either. Isn't Greed a sin?

NaNook

NaNook
salinsky wrote:I have the sneaking suspicion that Harry's anonymous source is all too real and won't be remaining anonymous for long. I'm thinking they're just giving Willard as much rope as he's willing to take, and at the appropriate time (maybe smack dab in the middle of the RNC), the source will reveal himself. He'll probably be a former Bain exec and a fellow member of the Mormon cult, and be very hard for Willard to dismiss.

I'm thinking a Union Investor in Bain is bragging about his inside info. Bain was a closed investment fund via several classes. Bain made millions for unions/states/colleges/charties/..I guess success is dirty?

Sounds like a Union Man, without balls enough, to come forward. I thought Union Men were brave??????? Un-named, what a real source?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger
NaNook wrote:
salinsky wrote:I have the sneaking suspicion that Harry's anonymous source is all too real and won't be remaining anonymous for long. I'm thinking they're just giving Willard as much rope as he's willing to take, and at the appropriate time (maybe smack dab in the middle of the RNC), the source will reveal himself. He'll probably be a former Bain exec and a fellow member of the Mormon cult, and be very hard for Willard to dismiss.

I'm thinking a Union Investor in Bain is bragging about his inside info. Bain was a closed investment fund via several classes. Bain made millions for unions/states/colleges/charties/..I guess success is dirty?

Sounds like a Union Man, without balls enough, to come forward. I thought Union Men were brave??????? Un-named, what a real source?

Okay, somebody please give us all a valid, good reason why little Mitty boy won't open his tax records? I mean, other than because he's hiding the fact that Harry Reid is right and he hasn't paid any taxes in ten years .... LOL

NaNook

NaNook
Wordslinger wrote:
NaNook wrote:
salinsky wrote:I have the sneaking suspicion that Harry's anonymous source is all too real and won't be remaining anonymous for long. I'm thinking they're just giving Willard as much rope as he's willing to take, and at the appropriate time (maybe smack dab in the middle of the RNC), the source will reveal himself. He'll probably be a former Bain exec and a fellow member of the Mormon cult, and be very hard for Willard to dismiss.

I'm thinking a Union Investor in Bain is bragging about his inside info. Bain was a closed investment fund via several classes. Bain made millions for unions/states/colleges/charties/..I guess success is dirty?

Sounds like a Union Man, without balls enough, to come forward. I thought Union Men were brave??????? Un-named, what a real source?

Okay, somebody please give us all a valid, good reason why little Mitty boy won't open his tax records? I mean, other than because he's hiding the fact that Harry Reid is right and he hasn't paid any taxes in ten years .... LOL

I agree, Obama should release his college financial aid transcripts. Did Obama "crowd out" another deserving student? Obama wrote, " affirmative action " gave him an advantage his whole life. It's in his very few papers....

You can deny what Obama said. We're use to it........

Wordslinger

Wordslinger
It turns out Mitt is now running from his "accomplishments" as CEO of Bain Capital, running also from his Romneycare program in Massachussets, running from his tax records, running from his former pro-life stand, running from his embarassing statements in London, Israel, etc... and so on, and so on, and so on.

Yessir, I wanna have my best camera ready when all you conservatives start leaping from tall buildings after the election. LOL

Sponsored content


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum