New forum rule

Dreamsglore wrote:It doesn't matter if you click on it or not. It was reprehensible the whole content of the thread.You keep using that same old worn out excuse.

Dreamsglore wrote:It is an excuse. Seaoat replied to what he thinks are Nazi posts. That's his right.Teo's a big boy. He can defend himself. Why are you trying to say Seaoat doesn't have a right to do that when he finds the content offensive? Teo doesn't have to reply but it's not your job to determine who's harassing who.

Nekochan wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:It is an excuse. Seaoat replied to what he thinks are Nazi posts. That's his right.Teo's a big boy. He can defend himself. Why are you trying to say Seaoat doesn't have a right to do that when he finds the content offensive? Teo doesn't have to reply but it's not your job to determine who's harassing who.

Seaoat absolutely has a right to reply to Teo's posts.  If Seaoat is offended or disagrees with Teo's post, then he should challenge him on what he's posting. 

Comparing Teo to a child pornographer and then going around calling Teo a Nazi on posts and threads that had nothing to do with Nazis is harassment.  

But you say that it's not my job to determine harassment?   Since when did it become Seaoat's job to compare forum members to child pornographers and to follow someone all over the forum yelling "Nazi!"?

2seaoat wrote:I don't care what any of you say. There were some low and cheap shots at Seaoat regarding his cancer especially from Hallmark. I'm talking about below the ground low and not one of you called foul. Those kind of remarks are what you would expect from Chrissy and GBB. Now you're trying to jump on Seaoat for calling Teo a Nazi. Unfrigginbelieveable.


Neko cannot help herself, but actually it was not me who first called Teo a sick puppy.   I simply agreed and put all his posts in context and called them what they truly are......rantings of a nazi.  Now Hallmark was completely correct....nobody should have to tip toe on a subject like cancer.  However, the concept is still be missed by many.  The anti intellectual book burning resentment of established medical treatments was a fundamental course of action of the Nazis who felt that science and medicine had been taken over by jewish influence.   Whether it is vaccines, cancer, diet, T has a proven track record of posting bad statistics from non recognized medical sources and then extrapolates his anti science, anti government, anti black, anti jewish, anti hispanic from baseless lies.  When he actually has the courage to respond to me pointing this out over the years is ......oh I did not know, I just provided the link.....happen stance and accident......Hardly.

Yes Neko....without equivication, I find Nazi hate as repulsive as child porn.  You evidently do not.  Why now pretend that you are repulsed by our alleged perp in BP.  You sat in silence when he did wrong.  I took him on.   You have not even acknowledged the hateful stuff T posts....you know the content which was my analogy......not even a twinge of integrity.  silence.........you are the forum Sgt hans Schultz.... I know nothing! I was not here! I did not even get up this morning!

Dreamsglore wrote:

Nekochan wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:It is an excuse. Seaoat replied to what he thinks are Nazi posts. That's his right.Teo's a big boy. He can defend himself. Why are you trying to say Seaoat doesn't have a right to do that when he finds the content offensive? Teo doesn't have to reply but it's not your job to determine who's harassing who.

Seaoat absolutely has a right to reply to Teo's posts.  If Seaoat is offended or disagrees with Teo's post, then he should challenge him on what he's posting. 

Comparing Teo to a child pornographer and then going around calling Teo a Nazi on posts and threads that had nothing to do with Nazis is harassment.  

But you say that it's not my job to determine harassment?   Since when did it become Seaoat's job to compare forum members to child pornographers and to follow someone all over the forum yelling "Nazi!"?

Ok so that's what he's doing--challenging him. He responds to his posts. Just because you don't like his responses doesn't mean he doesn't have the right to do it. You find no problem w/ Teo's intentional jabs at Seaoat but yell when Seaoat pokes him back. It makes no sense.

Dreamsglore wrote:No problem here though when Teo posts dying cancer patient pictures to someone who has cancer. That doesn't compare to someone comparing him to a child pornographer,right?

Mr Ichi wrote:I don't care what any of you say. There were some low and cheap shots at Seaoat regarding his cancer especially from Hallmark. I'm talking about below the ground low and not one of you called foul. Those kind of remarks are what you would expect from Chrissy and GBB. Now you're trying to jump on Seaoat for calling Teo a Nazi. Unfrigginbelieveable.

It is a tough game.  Remember Seaoats said we were "Dim Witts" to meet each other in real time.  Why did he say that?  Because "Seaoats" is a ghost, a vapor,  A Walter Mitty type of dream world persona that does not exist.  Mr Oats is not real!!   He can not meet others because there is not "Real" Seaoats, only the rambling of someone living in a dream world.  I would never speak harshly to another person who is ill.  Mr Oats is not real.  I have no regrets talk shit to a ghost.  Hell, Oats will not even disclose where he is located less it destroys his illusion.  You dont have to feel sorry or apologize to a ghost, a vapor, a nothing.  I damn sure dont....Nailed it !!

2seaoat wrote:I didn't see any Nazi talk in the chemo thread.

Let me help you.  An article in a nutrition magazine used a thirty year average looking at the efficacy of chemo, and the Australian study concluded an only 2-3% efficacy.  I immediately gave a real medical site which had the efficacy 6 fold and was not using twenty year old data, and not taking into account the blended therapies which involve biological, targeted radiation, and blends of chemo.  The data was corrupt.  It is a lie.  There is absolutely no efficacy with chemo in the treatment of many cancers.  There are numerous examples.  My doctors from the get go said this was not an option and the efficacy is far too low.  Yet this nutrition magazine takes this skewed and inaccurate data which is twenty years old and averages the same.....idiotic.  A fifth grader who passed math could understand this study is not accurately reflecting the efficacy of chemo, and assumes that medical science cannot distinguish and give patients informed consent on survival rates and modalities of treatment.  A total LIE, which floods into the stream of information and attacks institutions which are based on science and learning......not book burning lies.

As always I will show the lies, and within a day another nazi thread will start with a different angle, but each of these threads comply with the central tenets of the ideology.  Some things require a microscope....some things require a telescope......but with T most simply require a gas mask.

2seaoat wrote:Australians are also Nazis.  Thanks for clearing that up. Rolling Eyes

That was clever and clearly showed your grasp of the subject.

2seaoat wrote:You said you'd explain it to me

That bridge is too far....