Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Once Again Putin Kicks Obama's Ass

+8
Markle
Hospital Bob
Joanimaroni
VectorMan
2seaoat
TEOTWAWKI
gulfbeachbandit
Wordslinger
12 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 3]

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

For about 25 years I was around the people who operate gambling,  seaoat.
That taught me a winning "system" when I go into a casino.
I make an occasional penny bet on a slot machine so the cocktail waitress will get me a free Crown Royal.  And then I play a few more pennies to get another free Crown Royal.
And then I go get the inexpensive (sometimes free for seniors) all-you-can-eat buffet and leave.

2seaoat



Take a couple hundred bucks and go over to greyhound. Do not bet unless you have the lock......play two hours. Tell us about your adventure. You may see me there in the next couple weeks. Look for the street person.

Sal

Sal

2seaoat wrote: Alcohol and poker are not a good combination. lol


There are a few more elements.  However, I do like playing poker late at night with young kids who are drinking and have watched a great deal of poker and use the lingo.  Pure amusement.
I'd bet they have something to teach you. 


You can learn A LOT from watching poker played on TV. 

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

2seaoat wrote:Take a couple hundred bucks and go over to greyhound.  Do not bet unless you have the lock......play two hours.  Tell us about your adventure.  You may see me there in the next couple weeks.  Look for the street person.
I don't know how that works. How much of a cut does the greyhound park take?

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I have a better idea.  Come visit me and put as much money as you wish into my slot machine.  But you'll need to bring your own bottle and eats. lol

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

p.s. if there were any law enforcement authorities reading that last post, it was just a joke. lol

Guest


Guest

Barry is playing with himself

Guest


Guest

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Barry is playing with himself
That's it. Im nauseated. pale 

first I have to tolerate people encouraging sal to yank his wiener and now a comment on o playing with himself.

I cant stand the visual...... must leave and go rinse my head out.

knothead

knothead

We all must deal with it, it's our credibility on the line so are you an American or an Obama hater? Can't be both . . . . .

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

knothead wrote:We all must deal with it, it's our credibility on the line so are you an American or an Obama hater? Can't be both . . . . .
They said the same thing when Bush wanted to invade Iraq.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

Chrissy wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Barry is playing with himself
That's it. Im nauseated. pale 

first I have to tolerate people encouraging sal to yank his wiener and now a comment on o playing with himself.

I cant stand the visual...... must leave and go rinse my head out.
Unfortunately the visually yeechy advice was to spare Sal from the most painful thing a man can face after years of hard work and investment both with his finances and his family... Divorce, caused by a sexual drive that a few minutes alone in thought can placate . It might save his marriage, heck might save his sanity.

knothead

knothead

Bob wrote:
knothead wrote:We all must deal with it, it's our credibility on the line so are you an American or an Obama hater? Can't be both . . . . .
They said the same thing when Bush wanted to invade Iraq.
*******************************************************

Bob, I disagree that this is a repeat of the Iraq invasion . . . . . the intel was so flawed in the Iraqi incursion and propped up by such notables as Colin Powell who appeared before the UN making a case for invasion, all based on faulty intel. I am as exhausted as you with these endless civil conflicts around the world and the world expects who to fix it? Yep, USA . . . . it is a very complex situation of what ifs and what if we do nots that I am conflicted as everyone else as to the right course of action. Because we know Obama is not a neo-con and we know he has far more information than you or I, it seems that if Americans would come together to form a united front against this behavior it would give America the upper hand. We both know that many in Congress hate President Obama so much that it clouds their ability to join in a combined and cohesive answer to the proven use of gassing of it own population. Either we care or we do not and I know that is an over simplification of a complex situation.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

Once Again Putin Kicks Obama's Ass - Page 2 Histor11

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

knothead wrote:

Bob, I disagree that this is a repeat of the Iraq invasion . . . . . the intel was so flawed in the Iraqi incursion  and propped up by such notables as Colin Powell who appeared before the UN making a case for invasion, all based on faulty intel.  I am as exhausted as you with these endless civil conflicts around the world and the world expects who to fix it? Yep, USA . . . . it is a very complex situation of what ifs and what if we do nots that I am conflicted as everyone else as to the right course of action.  Because we know Obama is not a neo-con and we know he has far more information than you or I, it seems that if Americans would come together to form a united front against this behavior it would give America the upper hand.  We both know that many in Congress hate President Obama so much that it clouds their ability to join in a combined and cohesive answer to the proven use of gassing of it own population.  Either we care or we do not and I know that is an over simplification of a complex situation.  
Here's what the reality is about you and me and the federal government.

The only thing you or I can do is cast a vote in a presidential election every four years.  In this last election,  we were one of 126 million votes.
And that assumes we really know what we're voting for but we don't.

Our vote in the congressional election is meaningless.  Because Miller is there to stay until he decides to retire.

That's it.
So for us it's all just a tv reality show.  We can't have any impact on what happens in Syria anymore than we can have any influence on the script for Swamp People or Duck Dynasty or Here Comes Honey BooBoo.

I hate to be so blunt about it.  But sometimes it's better to just face up to reality rather than be in denial of it.

But that does not mean it's not fun to talk about. Because it is fun. It provides an escape for me like gardening does for some people. And there's nothing wrong with that.

knothead

knothead

Bob wrote:
knothead wrote:

Bob, I disagree that this is a repeat of the Iraq invasion . . . . . the intel was so flawed in the Iraqi incursion  and propped up by such notables as Colin Powell who appeared before the UN making a case for invasion, all based on faulty intel.  I am as exhausted as you with these endless civil conflicts around the world and the world expects who to fix it? Yep, USA . . . . it is a very complex situation of what ifs and what if we do nots that I am conflicted as everyone else as to the right course of action.  Because we know Obama is not a neo-con and we know he has far more information than you or I, it seems that if Americans would come together to form a united front against this behavior it would give America the upper hand.  We both know that many in Congress hate President Obama so much that it clouds their ability to join in a combined and cohesive answer to the proven use of gassing of it own population.  Either we care or we do not and I know that is an over simplification of a complex situation.  
Here's what the reality is about you and me and the federal government.

The only thing you or I can do is cast a vote in a presidential election every four years.  In this last election,  we were one of 126 million votes.
And that assumes we really know what we're voting for but we don't.

Our vote in the congressional election is meaningless.  Because Miller is there to stay until he decides to retire.

That's it.
So for us it's all just a tv reality show.  We can't have any impact on what happens in Syria anymore than we can have any influence on the script for Swamp People or Duck Dynasty or Here Comes Honey BooBoo.

I hate to be so blunt about it.  But sometimes it's better to just face up to reality rather than be in denial of it.

But that does not mean it's not fun to talk about.  Because it is fun.  It provides an escape for me like gardening does for some people.  And there's nothing wrong with that.
******************************************************

Bob, I agree with your analogy and am always in awe for your ability to express yourself in terms I can relate to . . . . albeit a humorous spin on world affairs and our relative inconsequential involvement but, as you said . . . . it's fun and it's what we like to do. I enjoy and admire your expressive writings as do others. So let's keep doing what we do . . . .

Nekochan

Nekochan

Bob wrote:
knothead wrote:We all must deal with it, it's our credibility on the line so are you an American or an Obama hater? Can't be both . . . . .
They said the same thing when Bush wanted to invade Iraq.
Yes they did.

Nekochan

Nekochan

knothead wrote:
Bob wrote:
knothead wrote:We all must deal with it, it's our credibility on the line so are you an American or an Obama hater? Can't be both . . . . .
They said the same thing when Bush wanted to invade Iraq.
*******************************************************

Bob, I disagree that this is a repeat of the Iraq invasion . . . . . the intel was so flawed in the Iraqi incursion  and propped up by such notables as Colin Powell who appeared before the UN making a case for invasion, all based on faulty intel.  I am as exhausted as you with these endless civil conflicts around the world and the world expects who to fix it? Yep, USA . . . . it is a very complex situation of what ifs and what if we do nots that I am conflicted as everyone else as to the right course of action.  Because we know Obama is not a neo-con and we know he has far more information than you or I, it seems that if Americans would come together to form a united front against this behavior it would give America the upper hand.  We both know that many in Congress hate President Obama so much that it clouds their ability to join in a combined and cohesive answer to the proven use of gassing of it own population.  Either we care or we do not and I know that is an over simplification of a complex situation.  
I think you just want so much to believe Obama. I've seen your derogatory remarks about President Bush. He was in a difficult situation as well.

Anyway, not everyone agrees with you about Obama making a great case.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_UNITED_STATES_SYRIA_FACT_CHECK?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-09-11-03-03-47

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Good evening --

I just addressed the nation about the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

Over the past two years, what began as a series of peaceful protests against the repressive regime of Bashar al-Assad has turned into a brutal civil war in Syria. Over 100,000 people have been killed.

In that time, we have worked with friends and allies to provide humanitarian support for the Syrian people, to help the moderate opposition within Syria, and to shape a political settlement. But we have resisted calls for military action because we cannot resolve someone else's civil war through force.

The situation profoundly changed in the early hours of August 21, when more than 1,000 Syrians -- including hundreds of children -- were killed by chemical weapons launched by the Assad government.

What happened to those people -- to those children -- is not only a violation of international law -- it's also a danger to our security. Here's why:

If we fail to act, the Assad regime will see no reason to stop using chemical weapons. As the ban against these deadly weapons erodes, other tyrants and authoritarian regimes will have no reason to think twice about acquiring poison gases and using them. Over time, our troops could face the prospect of chemical warfare on the battlefield. It could be easier for terrorist organizations to obtain these weapons and use them to attack civilians. If fighting spills beyond Syria's borders, these weapons could threaten our allies in the region.

So after careful deliberation, I determined that it is in the national security interests of the United States to respond to the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons through a targeted military strike. The purpose of this strike would be to deter Assad from using chemical weapons, to degrade his regime's ability to use them, and make clear to the world that we will not tolerate their use.

Though I possess the authority to order these strikes, in the absence of a direct threat to our security I believe that Congress should consider my decision to act. Our democracy is stronger when the President acts with the support of Congress -- and when Americans stand together as one people.

Over the last few days, as this debate unfolds, we've already begun to see signs that the credible threat of U.S. military action may produce a diplomatic breakthrough. The Russian government has indicated a willingness to join with the international community in pushing Assad to give up his chemical weapons and the Assad regime has now admitted that it has these weapons, and even said they'd join the Chemical Weapons Convention, which prohibits their use.

It's too early to tell whether this offer will succeed, and any agreement must verify that the Assad regime keeps its commitments. But this initiative has the potential to remove the threat of chemical weapons without the use of force.

That's why I've asked the leaders of Congress to postpone a vote to authorize the use of force while we pursue this diplomatic path. I'm sending Secretary of State John Kerry to meet his Russian counterpart on Thursday, and I will continue my own discussions with President Putin. At the same time, we'll work with two of our closest allies -- France and the United Kingdom -- to put forward a resolution at the U.N. Security Council requiring Assad to give up his chemical weapons, and to ultimately destroy them under international control.

Meanwhile, I've ordered our military to maintain their current posture to keep the pressure on Assad, and to be in a position to respond if diplomacy fails. And tonight, I give thanks again to our military and their families for their incredible strength and sacrifices.

As we continue this debate -- in Washington, and across the country -- I need your help to make sure that everyone understands the factors at play.

Please share this message with others to make sure they know where I stand, and how they can stay up to date on this situation. Anyone can find the latest information about the situation in Syria, including video of tonight's address, here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/foreign-policy/syria

2seaoat



Heeeee Haaaw the braying will begin, hook, line, and sinker after two weeks of folks on this forum talking absurdities, the president just accomplished his highest priority in the 2008 platform, and has this critical debate about cutting back our military responses as a lead issue going into 2014. As the President whispered to the then President of Russia......we will work on these things after the election, people act surprised that diplomacy was always the goal, and this great conspiracy that we are controlled by foreign nations and the bombing was going to happen two weeks ago, confirms how gullible and reliable the president's opposition has become. The folks on the payroll of the military industrial complex are going into the elections isolated, while the new isolationist who claimed bombs were going to be dropped have the suspicion of the American people who realize that stupid should not be rewarded.

I did not vote for the man because I believe he has huge flaws on domestic priorities and the creation of private sector jobs over government jobs, but he has simply aced foreign policy. The nation is stronger with the breadth of responses which must remain uncertain to ever have any credibility. When we become predictably stupid, we lose.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

2seaoat wrote:Heeeee Haaaw the braying will begin, hook, line, and sinker after two weeks of folks on this forum talking absurdities, the president just accomplished his highest priority in the 2008 platform, and has this critical debate about cutting back our military responses as a lead issue going into 2014.  As the President whispered to the then President of Russia......we will work on these things after the election, people act surprised that diplomacy was always the goal, and this great conspiracy that we are controlled by foreign nations and the bombing was going to happen two weeks ago, confirms how gullible and reliable the president's opposition has become.  The folks on the payroll of the military industrial complex are going into the elections isolated, while the new isolationist who claimed bombs were going to be dropped have the suspicion of the American people who realize that stupid should not be rewarded.

I did not vote for the man because I believe he has huge flaws on domestic priorities and the creation of private sector jobs over government jobs, but he has simply aced foreign policy.  The nation is stronger with the breadth of responses which must remain uncertain to ever have any credibility.  When we become predictably stupid, we lose.

Bullshit..this is just the American people waking up and not being driven by fear-mongering into another useless war. Obama was ineffective and you call that a virtue... ..Whatever, If the country doesn't believe or trust his stream of lies then to me he's the perfect president for this time in history.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Well friends . . . no matter how you look at it: Obama was brilliant or Putin was . .

We all win when there are no bombs falling!

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

Floridatexan wrote:
Good evening --

I just addressed the nation about the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

Over the past two years, what began as a series of peaceful protests against the repressive regime of Bashar al-Assad has turned into a brutal civil war in Syria. Over 100,000 people have been killed.

In that time, we have worked with friends and allies to provide humanitarian support for the Syrian people, to help the moderate opposition within Syria, and to shape a political settlement. But we have resisted calls for military action because we cannot resolve someone else's civil war through force.

The situation profoundly changed in the early hours of August 21, when more than 1,000 Syrians -- including hundreds of children -- were killed by chemical weapons launched by the Assad government.

What happened to those people -- to those children -- is not only a violation of international law -- it's also a danger to our security. Here's why:

If we fail to act, the Assad regime will see no reason to stop using chemical weapons. As the ban against these deadly weapons erodes, other tyrants and authoritarian regimes will have no reason to think twice about acquiring poison gases and using them. Over time, our troops could face the prospect of chemical warfare on the battlefield. It could be easier for terrorist organizations to obtain these weapons and use them to attack civilians. If fighting spills beyond Syria's borders, these weapons could threaten our allies in the region.

So after careful deliberation, I determined that it is in the national security interests of the United States to respond to the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons through a targeted military strike. The purpose of this strike would be to deter Assad from using chemical weapons, to degrade his regime's ability to use them, and make clear to the world that we will not tolerate their use.

Though I possess the authority to order these strikes, in the absence of a direct threat to our security I believe that Congress should consider my decision to act. Our democracy is stronger when the President acts with the support of Congress -- and when Americans stand together as one people.

Over the last few days, as this debate unfolds, we've already begun to see signs that the credible threat of U.S. military action may produce a diplomatic breakthrough. The Russian government has indicated a willingness to join with the international community in pushing Assad to give up his chemical weapons and the Assad regime has now admitted that it has these weapons, and even said they'd join the Chemical Weapons Convention, which prohibits their use.

It's too early to tell whether this offer will succeed, and any agreement must verify that the Assad regime keeps its commitments. But this initiative has the potential to remove the threat of chemical weapons without the use of force.

That's why I've asked the leaders of Congress to postpone a vote to authorize the use of force while we pursue this diplomatic path. I'm sending Secretary of State John Kerry to meet his Russian counterpart on Thursday, and I will continue my own discussions with President Putin. At the same time, we'll work with two of our closest allies -- France and the United Kingdom -- to put forward a resolution at the U.N. Security Council requiring Assad to give up his chemical weapons, and to ultimately destroy them under international control.

Meanwhile, I've ordered our military to maintain their current posture to keep the pressure on Assad, and to be in a position to respond if diplomacy fails. And tonight, I give thanks again to our military and their families for their incredible strength and sacrifices.

As we continue this debate -- in Washington, and across the country -- I need your help to make sure that everyone understands the factors at play.

Please share this message with others to make sure they know where I stand, and how they can stay up to date on this situation. Anyone can find the latest information about the situation in Syria, including video of tonight's address, here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/foreign-policy/syria

Thank you for the copy-paste ....the material was written by a professional speech writer and delivered by Obama.

Nekochan

Nekochan

Don't you know that yesterday was a hectic day for the speechwriters!

Good thing for Obama that he didn't have to take any questions about what he had just read.

Sal

Sal

Wordslinger wrote:Well friends . . . no matter how you look at it:  Obama was brilliant or Putin was . .

We all win when there are no bombs falling!
Let's be real for a moment.

Obama's credible threat of using military strikes against Syria is what brought Putin to the table.

I'm not convinced that Obama was willing to circumvent Congress and attack on his own authority, but Putin was.

And, Putin knows that his benefits will best be served by avoiding that.

Thank gawd, the adults are in charge this time.


"I don’t think we should remove another dictator with force -- we learned from Iraq that doing so makes us responsible for all that comes next."

Once Again Putin Kicks Obama's Ass - Page 2 Tumblr_inline_mfd3t0Vl061qiv5yk

Nekochan

Nekochan

But...Russia said that the "threat force" must be off the table with their Syria deal.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 3]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum