This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

The Ford-Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Case Study in GOP Misogyny

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]


By Frank Rich, New York Magazine

29 September 18



Most weeks, New York Magazine writer-at-large Frank Rich speaks with contributor Alex Carp about the biggest stories in politics and culture. Today, the Senate testimony of Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh.

Going into the Brett Kavanaugh hearing, critics questioned the choice of Republicans to cede many of their questions to Rachel Mitchell, a veteran sex crimes prosecutor. Was the hearing fair?

The hearing was a travesty, at once tragic, corrupt, and hateful.

The decision of the 11 Republican men on the committee to delegate their questioning to a prosecutor Mitch McConnell called a “female assistant” wasn’t even the most outrageous aspect of the proceedings. It says much about the hearing as a whole that while Mitchell did the men’s dirty work — failing to pursue any evidence that might corroborate Christine Blasey Ford’s narrative (e.g., a conspicuous entry in Kavanaugh’s Summer of ’82 calendar) — she too was in the end was belittled for the failing of being a woman. Banished to her seat at the children’s table soon after Kavanaugh started to testify, she sat in humiliated silence while Lindsey Graham and his bros took over the questioning to beat up on Ford in absentia once her testimony had ended.

The ways in which this shitshow was not fair are many. A fair hearing would have called witnesses, and not just Mark Judge, to testify under oath about the incidents ostensibly being adjudicated, so that their unvetted public statements could be subject to cross-examination. A fair hearing would not have subjected a sexual-assault victim to a sex-crimes prosecutor while shielding the accused from equal scrutiny. A fair hearing would not have allowed men, from the doddering, filibustering chairman Chuck Grassley to Kavanaugh himself, to interrupt, condescend to, and talk over the questioners, particularly women on the committee. A fair hearing might also have been abetted by a coordinated line of inquiry from the Democrats, who often repeated each other’s questions (netting the identical answers) instead of collaborating on a comprehensive strategy that would advance the unraveling of Kavanaugh’s dishonest defense. Indeed, the Democratic men would have been well advised — as some had suggested — to turn over most of the questioning to Amy Klobuchar and Kamala Harris, experienced prosecutors who in their allotted five minutes each drew blood and forced Kavanaugh to bare his teeth in contempt of their gender. But alas, Democratic men will also be men. Each needed his moment center stage. So instances of Kavanaugh’s lying, including those not directly related to Ford’s testimony, both in real time and in the past, went largely unmentioned and unaddressed. The Democrats also failed to debunk Kavanaugh’s repeated misrepresentation that Ford’s friend Leland Keyser had rebutted her account of what happened that summer night in 1982.

Jill Abramson, the co-author (with Jane Mayer) of Strange Justice, the definitive account of the Clarence Thomas–Anita Hill debacle, had it right when she wrote on the eve of this hearing that it had a “predetermined outcome.” Like the 1991 template, in which the showily pious Republican senator John Danforth served as a beard for his peers’ cynicism, the 2018 replay had the window dressing of its own moralistic Hamlet, Jeff Flake.

Donald Trump’s views are notoriously influenced by how things look on TV. With the country watching, how did Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford do?

By many accounts, even Trump was somewhat disarmed by Ford’s testimony — at least enough so to worry, with good reason, that she might impress most of those watching (if not his own base) as credible, courageous, and deeply moving. He was worried as well because in his view Kavanaugh’s pre-hearing prime-time appearance on Fox News had been a flop. He didn’t like his nominee’s PR strategy of presenting himself as a choirboy.

The Kavanaugh that emerged at the hearing understandably was much more to Trump’s liking — he dropped the Mr. Nice Guy pose and let his full Trump roar. He emerged as a bully, a screamer, a conspiracy theorist, a rabid partisan, and a guilt-free purveyor of falsehoods big and small (including about instantly Google-able definitions of sexual terms he used in his high-school yearbook).

For all his self-congratulation about the many (good-looking) women he has appointed clerks, he also behaved like an unalloyed misogynist. In his Fox News interview, he had revealed his contempt for women subtly — by stepping in to man-answer a question the interviewer posed to his wife. In the hearing, he did just what Trump would do: accusing a woman who dared question him (Klobuchar) of the accusation she had raised about him (drinking to excess). If anything, he out-Trumped Trump in one area: While Trump is a teetotaler, Kavanaugh has the personality of a raging, self-pitying, out-of-control drunk. (He seems to think drinking doesn’t count as long as it’s beer.) As he tried to shut Klobuchar down with his bullying and bellowing, it was all too easy to visualize him pushing his hand on the teenage Ford’s mouth to stop her from screaming for help during an attempted rape. It was hardly a surprise that Kavanaugh said he didn’t deign to watch Ford’s testimony.

Trump didn’t think John McCain was a hero, but he was thrilled by Kavanaugh. No wonder. Kavanaugh stood up to Ford and his other accusers as Trump has to the nearly two dozen women (we know about) who have accused him of sexual assault. In light of a NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist pre-hearing poll showing that a majority (54 percent) of Republicans believe that Kavanaugh should be on the court even if it’s true that he assaulted women, he is the ideal Supreme Court justice for the party of Trump. We should not forget, however, that this misogynist culture ruled the GOP well before Trump came along: Grassley, Orrin Hatch, and Lindsey Graham, among so many others, were there first.

Whether in the Senate chamber or out in America, what has this hearing changed, and what has it not?

About the only positive change to come out of this hearing — and I am being facetious — is that we now know that Republican men have been carefully schooled on how to profess “respect” for female victims of sexual assault. They have become expert at intoning that they care about rape victims because they are speaking “as the father of daughters” — as if those of us who are the fathers of sons, or those men who aren’t fathers at all, needn’t give a damn about women who are abused by men. These senators’ behavior at the hearing amply demonstrated that they don’t mean a word of the flowery sentiments some strategist has forced them to memorize. As committee chairman, Grassley set the tone. “You got what you wanted — I’d think you’d be satisfied,” he snapped at Klobuchar as if she were a maidservant after she thwarted his attempt to bulldoze her. Out in the hallway during a break, Lindsey Graham “praised” Ford by calling her “a nice lady”; Hatch’s term of choice was “attractive.” The guiding principle of the hearing, subscribed to by all of these Republican senators, was that men are the victims most worthy of our sympathy in sexual assaults, not women. The grievance of white male victimization — by women, by minorities, by elites — is Trumpism at its ugliest core.

More than a quarter-century later, it feels as if very little has changed since Clarence Thomas was elevated to the court, #MeToo notwithstanding. Had Ford not been white — and from the professional class — you have to wonder whether the Republican men on the committee would have completely dropped their patently phony pretense of concern for her welfare and stabbed her in the front instead of the back. What will follow now is a national tsunami of rage much as there was after the sliming of Anita Hill. And the aggrieved will not just be those “suburban women” politicos keep pigeon-holing, but most women, and more and more men. We have to hope that this rage will sweep more women into office as it did in 1992, the so-called Year of the Woman. And sweep some women out, too, including Susan Collins, whose tired act — repeated, feckless expressions of being “concerned” about Trumpian horrors while doing nothing about them — should be punished by Maine’s voters when she’s up for reelection in 2020.

What an awful day. My colleague at Veep, the showrunner David Mandel, is a master of finding dark humor in Washington horrors, but he reflected my mood, and I imagine that of many, when he said after these hearings that “it’s starting to seem like it was an accident that the country worked as long as it did.” As I write, there’s a faint hope Kavanaugh will not make it to the Court. There’s a less faint hope that the GOP will lose control of at least one chamber of Congress in November.

But even if those battles are won, the fact remains that America has a major political party more dedicated than ever to stripping women of power by any ruthless means it can.

https://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/52551-focus-the-ford-kavanaugh-hearings-were-a-case-study-in-gop-misogyny

View user profile
I would agree if this incident happened in the last ten years while he was a judge and memories were fresh. I mean if some people were coming forward and saying the judge has been too impaired to do his job.......those are pretty relevant.

However, the #meto movement has gone too far here. There will be a backlash in America. Not a chance in hell the Democrats will take the senate, and depending how strident and crybaby like the democrats are when they realize Flake snookered them, the American people will be watching. I personally have seen too many false accusations in the last forty years, and the Duke Lacrosse team hysteria stopped this nonsense for almost a decade, but now a simple unverified accusation from forty years ago can empower an alleged victim, and starts another hysteria which abandons innocence until proven guilty. Keep telling me about this blue wave, and tell me how the American people are eating this crapburger and think Democrats have been fair. lol!

View user profile
2seaoat wrote:I would agree if this incident happened in the last ten years while he was a judge and memories were fresh.  I mean if some people were coming forward and saying the judge has been too impaired to do his job.......those are pretty relevant.

However, the #meto movement has gone too far here.  There will be a backlash in America.  Not a chance in hell the Democrats will take the senate, and depending how strident and crybaby like the democrats are when they realize Flake snookered them, the American people will be watching.  I personally have seen too many false accusations in the last forty years, and the Duke Lacrosse team hysteria stopped this nonsense for almost a decade, but now a simple unverified accusation from forty years ago can empower an alleged victim, and starts another hysteria which abandons innocence until proven guilty.  Keep telling me about this blue wave, and tell me how the American people are eating this crapburger and think Democrats have been fair. lol!

He told obvious lies in that hearing, Seagoat...and it looks like he lied in his confirmation hearing in 2006, claiming no knowledge of Judge Kosinski's penchant for porn. Apparently, the #metoo movement hasn't gone far enough. He's not on trial, though it appeared SHE was. And he also displayed obvious partisanship, citing a "conspiracy" against him by the Clintons. We know why Drumpf wants him...



View user profile
2seaoat wrote:I would agree if this incident happened in the last ten years while he was a judge and memories were fresh.  I mean if some people were coming forward and saying the judge has been too impaired to do his job.......those are pretty relevant.

However, the #meto movement has gone too far here.  There will be a backlash in America.  Not a chance in hell the Democrats will take the senate, and depending how strident and crybaby like the democrats are when they realize Flake snookered them, the American people will be watching.  I personally have seen too many false accusations in the last forty years, and the Duke Lacrosse team hysteria stopped this nonsense for almost a decade, but now a simple unverified accusation from forty years ago can empower an alleged victim, and starts another hysteria which abandons innocence until proven guilty.  Keep telling me about this blue wave, and tell me how the American people are eating this crapburger and think Democrats have been fair.  

Are you really this dense or is the senile dementia creeping up on ya'?  

How dare you mention fairness after the Merrick Garland nomination!

Your concept of fairness is a one-way street. You should be ashamed of yourself.

View user profile
How dare you mention fairness after the Merrick Garland nomination!



HA HA.........In the senate, the folks with the most votes confirm. The folks in a democracy are NOT obliged to vote against their interest. The Republicans were too smart for whining impotent Democrats to get the votes. I would have liked Garland appointed, but elections have consequences and you need to win the senate if you want to control the process. This chit show has guaranteed two more years of Republican control of the senate...........bet on it.

It is too late. The court will remain conservative for the next twenty years, and if it was not so tragic, it would be hilarious that these theatrics and this whole last minute attempt to smear the candidate caused the senate to be lost again.

View user profile
2seaoat wrote:How dare you mention fairness after the Merrick Garland nomination!



HA HA.........In the senate, the folks with the most votes confirm.  The folks in a democracy are NOT obliged to vote against their interest.  The Republicans were too smart for whining impotent Democrats to get the votes.  I would have liked Garland appointed, but elections have consequences and you need to win the senate if you want to control the process.  This chit show has guaranteed two more years of Republican control of the senate...........bet on it.

It is too late.  The court will remain conservative for the next twenty years, and if it was not so tragic, it would be hilarious that these theatrics and this whole last minute attempt to smear the candidate caused the senate to be lost again.

YOU'RE the one who brought up fairness! I realize you're experiencing some senile dementia and I try to make allowances for that but, really, this is a bit much.

View user profile
YOU'RE the one who brought up fairness!


Please show me where there was a due process violation when the senate did not start the confirmation hearing. Our founding fathers wisely shared the appointment of Supreme Court Justices requiring the advice and consent of the Senate. Please show me where he was confirmed. He was not because our founding father's by design reserved power with the Senate. Impotence is not an alluring vote generator, and the American public has never really stomached weak and impotent leadership. They would rather support a sixth grader who plays a tough guy. I bet you were upset when the tooth fairy did not leave a quarter.

View user profile
I don't think that the gop could've handled her any more delicately. The true misogyny was the dems orchestrating this political stunt against dr Ford's will. That letter was confidential... and she was never even informed that the gop would go so far as to question her at her home or even privately if she preferred. Of course... that wouldn't have served the leftists politically... so they scorched the earth. Nice job comrades.

View user profile
so they scorched the earth. Nice

Cotton has made it clear they will investigate the disclosure to the press. Between now and the mid terms showing Booker in his Spartacus moment, and the commercials will be relentless. I did not think they would win back either the senate or house, but now with the Republicans having double the money of democrats coming into this midterm......the hysteria of talking heads have once again led the democratic party into the Rachel Maddow syndrome.....pure hubris and arrogance.

View user profile

Sponsored content


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum