Will The SOTU Be Known As Stormy Tuesday?

Hell not just Stormy but invite all of the women 45 has harassed. His Vietnam years.  

Kimmel to interview Stormy Daniels after Trump SOTU


Late night host Jimmy Kimmel will interview Stormy Daniels, the adult film star President Trump reportedly had an affair with, after Trump’s State of the Union next week.

“I have MANY QUESTIONS! #MAGA,” Kimmel tweeted in his announcement of Daniels’s appearance.

Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, said in a 2011 interview with In Touch magazine she had an affair with Trump after he was married to first lady Melania Trump.

The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month that Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, arranged a $130,000 payment to the adult film star shortly before the 2016 election to make her stay quiet about the affair.

Cohen has disputed the reports.

Trump will deliver his first State of the Union on Tuesday, Jan. 30.




http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/370828-kimmel-to-interview-stormy-daniels-after-trump-sotu

Will try to remember to catch Kimmel just for the opportunity to judge whether Stormy seems as accomplished a liar as Trump.

Nobody really cares all that much about the Stormy Daniels thing. This one will blow over pretty quick. We all knew Trump has been a womanizer pretty much his entire life so I can't see why anybody should be at all surprised, shocked, or whatever faux emotion they're having about it.   Look at the bright side .... at least he's not an alkie.

Even so, I do so hope they let Ms Daniels come as a special guest for the SOTU  ... and that Trump calls her out for special recognition during his speech!  

In looney leftist logic land this isn't "just sex" like Bill had... it's a pre election impeachable offence.

Strange but true.

Well, I don't know about ya'll, but personally I can't wait to see what dress Ms Daniels chooses to wear-to the SOTU. I hope it's red!

I'm glad you think she's attractive. I find it reprehensible that anyone would consider inviting her...it reeks of what Drumpf did to Hillary Clinton...the word for that is TACKY...which also describes Drumpf. Side note: Did you hear he wanted the loan of a Van Gogh from the Guggenheim for the White House, but they offered him a gold toilet instead?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/25/white-house-requested-van-gogh-got-golden-toilet-instead/

Floridatexan wrote:
I'm glad you think she's attractive.

Did I say she was "attractive"?   Well, okay .... although I'm not usually a fan of humongous boobs, I probably wouldn't throw her out of bed for eating crackers. Just knowing where she's been might put a damper on things for me though.   (of course, that might actually be a turn-on for folks like 'Pkr'? )

Anyways .... this thread was just crying for a pic, so I posted one.

Floridatexan wrote:
 I find it reprehensible that anyone would consider inviting her...it reeks of what Drumpf did to Hillary Clinton...the word for that is TACKY...which also describes Drumpf.  Side note:  Did you hear he wanted the loan of a Van Gogh from the Guggenheim for the White House, but they offered him a gold toilet instead?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/25/white-house-requested-van-gogh-got-golden-toilet-instead/

Well, looks like the Dems are gonna have Joe Kennedy III give the SOTU response.  How boring is that!   They really have no idea who/what they are up against with Trump, do they?   Doesn't speak well for coming up with a good 2020 challenger if you ask me.  I think it'd be really cool if they'd have Hillary give the SOTU response instead.   I just might watch it for the entertainment value if they did that.

EmeraldGhost wrote:  Just knowing where she's been might put a damper on things for me though.   (of course, that might actually be a turn-on for folks like 'Pkr'?    )

HEY.... lol. I took another look... and she's over the top in many ways. No thanks...

EmeraldGhost wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:
I'm glad you think she's attractive.

Did I say she was "attractive"?   Well, okay .... although I'm not usually a fan of humongous boobs, I probably wouldn't throw her out of bed for eating crackers.   Just knowing where she's been might put a damper on things for me though.   (of course, that might actually be a turn-on for folks like 'Pkr'?    )

Anyways .... this thread was just crying for a pic, so I posted one.

Floridatexan wrote:
 I find it reprehensible that anyone would consider inviting her...it reeks of what Drumpf did to Hillary Clinton...the word for that is TACKY...which also describes Drumpf.  Side note:  Did you hear he wanted the loan of a Van Gogh from the Guggenheim for the White House, but they offered him a gold toilet instead?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/25/white-house-requested-van-gogh-got-golden-toilet-instead/

Well, looks like the Dems are gonna have Joe Kennedy III give the SOTU response.  How boring is that!   They really have no idea who/what they are up against with Trump, do they?   Doesn't speak well for coming up with a good 2020 challenger if you ask me.  I think it'd be really cool if they'd have Hillary give the SOTU response instead.   I just might watch it for the entertainment value if they did that.

I happen to be an admirer of Joe Kennedy III.

Floridatexan wrote:

EmeraldGhost wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:
I'm glad you think she's attractive.

Did I say she was "attractive"?   Well, okay .... although I'm not usually a fan of humongous boobs, I probably wouldn't throw her out of bed for eating crackers.   Just knowing where she's been might put a damper on things for me though.   (of course, that might actually be a turn-on for folks like 'Pkr'?    )

Anyways .... this thread was just crying for a pic, so I posted one.

Floridatexan wrote:
 I find it reprehensible that anyone would consider inviting her...it reeks of what Drumpf did to Hillary Clinton...the word for that is TACKY...which also describes Drumpf.  Side note:  Did you hear he wanted the loan of a Van Gogh from the Guggenheim for the White House, but they offered him a gold toilet instead?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/25/white-house-requested-van-gogh-got-golden-toilet-instead/

Well, looks like the Dems are gonna have Joe Kennedy III give the SOTU response.  How boring is that!   They really have no idea who/what they are up against with Trump, do they?   Doesn't speak well for coming up with a good 2020 challenger if you ask me.  I think it'd be really cool if they'd have Hillary give the SOTU response instead.   I just might watch it for the entertainment value if they did that.

I happen to be an admirer of Joe Kennedy III.  

Give him time and Fox News Pravda will be smearing him as much as they do the Clintons and Obama.

Floridatexan wrote:

I happen to be an admirer of Joe Kennedy III.  

So sorry to hear that. Hopefully they'll find a cure someday.

Don't know much about Joe the third but I'd never underestimate the charisma of a Kennedy.

Personally, I'd like Corey Booker to give the rebuttal. I think he's the future of the party.

bigdog wrote:Don't know much about Joe the third but I'd never underestimate the charisma of a Kennedy.

"the charisma of a Kennedy" ?        Oh, please ... give me a break.    Do all the Kennedy's send a thrill up your leg 'bd', or jus certain ones??

Newsflash for ya ... not everybody in the country is enamored of the Kennedys.    Personally, I can't stand most of 'em.

bigdog wrote:
Personally, I'd like Corey Booker to give the rebuttal. I think he's the future of the party.

Why do you want the Dems to lose in 2020?

EmeraldGhost wrote:

bigdog wrote:Don't know much about Joe the third but I'd never underestimate the charisma of a Kennedy.

"the charisma of a Kennedy" ?        Oh, please ... give me a break.    Do all the Kennedy's send a thrill up your leg 'bd', or jus certain ones??

Newsflash for ya ... not everybody in the country is enamored of the Kennedys.    Personally, I can't stand most of 'em.

bigdog wrote:
Personally, I'd like Corey Booker to give the rebuttal. I think he's the future of the party.

Why do you want the Dems to lose in 2020?

I'm would use my "one time" here... but I think I already used it to get Hillary nominated.

The real speech begins when bloatard shuts his lying pee hole and the next President begins his speech. Until then I've muted the lies.

Stupid is not being on the right side of history.

2seaoat wrote:Stupid is not being on the right side of history.

Stupid is enjoying when you get ass fucked by republicans.

Telstar wrote:
Stupid is enjoying when you get ass fucked by republicans.

As opposed to what?

Deus X wrote:

Telstar wrote:
Stupid is enjoying when you get ass fucked by republicans.  

As opposed to what?

I don't know, fist fucked by Milo?

Telstar wrote:Stupid is enjoying when you get ass fucked by republicans.

Well, I would think there would be at least some Dems who would enjoy such a thing .... seeing as how their party has most of the gay vote locked-in.