This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Liberal Avoidance?

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 11:42 am

Powerful bully, in Hillary's corner, demanded sexual favors.

This slug even attended the vagina hat festival/protest

View user profile

2 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 12:34 pm

The rich part to me was watching her condemn him in full voice knowing her handling of Bill's acts.

View user profile

3 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 12:50 pm

C'mon, guys, you surely know there was absolutely no way Hillary was going to win on this. If she DIDN'T condemn him -- since he was apparently a major contributor -- she would've been bashed just as loudly for her silence. She chose to stand up for the women, and that's the better of two poor choices, I'd say.

So seriously, please consider picking on something else where she's concerned -- you've always found plenty of other things in the past -- because, again, this was an absolutely no win situation for her, no matter what she did or didn't do.

View user profile

4 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 12:55 pm

Apparently many people knew about his reputation and yet Obama's daughter did her internship in his company.

View user profile

5 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 12:57 pm

Is that all y'all got?  Is he a politician? Govt employee?  On the DNC payroll?

Nope just one of many hollywood douchebags.  Nothing to see here folks.

I'm waiting for the claim that the mainstream media is avoiding the story too?



Last edited by panhandler on 10/11/2017, 12:59 pm; edited 1 time in total

View user profile

6 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 12:58 pm

Joanimaroni wrote:Apparently many people knew about his reputation and yet Obama's daughter did her internship in his company.

Well then, we should horse whip Obama now shouldn't we.

You white wingers are pathetic.

View user profile

7 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 1:03 pm

Joanimaroni wrote:Powerful bully, in Hillary's corner, demanded sexual favors.

This slug even attended the vagina hat festival/protest


And here's a guy in a MAGA hat wearing a Nazi armband.



So, you culpable?

Here's David Duke, a KKK Grand Wizard, vowing support for Donald Trump.



You avoidin' that? I can find plenty of other examples of absolutely horrible people who support Trump, you want to play the "one bad example represents you all" game. You start that game up, you'll lose it quicker than a writing contest. That you think this is a good tactic for you to use is hilarious. Good lord, but you're stupid.

Harvey Weinstein is a piece of shit. Hillary already condemned him. I know of no Democrat defending Weinstein. He should be in prison, although I'd prefer dead. I'm not avoiding saying that at all. I mean, jeez, did you hear some of the taped shit Weinstein said about women? It was vile. Here's a transcript:


Harvey Weinstein: You know and ...

Unknown: She used to be great. She’s still very beautiful.

Weinstein: I moved on her, actually. You know, she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it.

Unknown: Whoa.

Weinstein: I did try and fuck her. She was married.

Unknown: That’s huge news.

Weinstein: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.

She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —

I moved on her like a bitch. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Billy Bush: Sheesh, your girl’s hot as shit. In the purple.

Weinstein: Whoa! Whoa!

[crosstalk]

Weinstein: Look at you, you are a pussy.

[Crosstalk]

Weinstein: All right, you and I will walk out.

[Silence]

Weinstein: Maybe it’s a different one.

Bush: It better not be the publicist. No, it’s, it’s her, it’s —

Weinstein: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Bush: Whatever you want.

Weinstein: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.

Bush: Uh, yeah, those legs, all I can see is the legs.

Weinstein: Oh, it looks good.

Bush: Come on shorty.

Weinstein: Ooh, nice legs, huh?

Oh, I'm sorry, there's been a mistake... that wasn't actually Harvey Weinstein, that was... some other guy. Anyway, the stuff Weinstein said was just as bad. I can hardly blame you for holding a candidate who he liked accountable for his behavior. I mean, how can we stop creeps like Harvey Weinstein unless we hold Hillary Clinton accountable for them?

I know, I know, a candidate can't really help who likes 'em (like that David Duke thing), and they can disavow the person (which Trump sorta did) or condemn their kind of behavior (which Trump still hasn't because, after all, there are "some good people" amongst the Nazis, right?), but still... they should totally be smeared with being liked by 'em. Guilt by association is only fair.

Yeah, being liked by an asshole is terrible. That's why I go out of my way to make sure the assholes on this board -- like Pkr and Alt and... oh, yeah, you -- don't like me. Wink

I mean, the only thing worse than being a candidate that Weinstein liked would probably be if there was a candidate who was actually like Weinstein himself. Wouldn't that be awful? And could you even imagine voting for such a guy? I mean, Jesus, what kind of a shit-bucket, snot-rocket piece of soulless festering human garbage would a person have to be to actually vote for a Harvey Weinstein type, who felt entitled to just grab women's pussies and stuff? My god, just think of it!

I can't even picture a person like that. They'd probably leave a slimy trail when they walked. Ugh.

View user profile

8 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 1:04 pm

The Obamas and Harvey Weinstein have had a long and public relationship.

Weinstein helped usher in thousands of dollars towards the former president’s campaigns and even gave his daughter, Malia, an internship at the Weinstein Company in New York before she started college this year.

Mrs. Obama also referred to Weinstein as a “wonderful human being” and “a good friend” at a 2013 event at the White House for high school students.

Hillary Clinton, who was also a recipient of Weinstein’s political support and donations, also came out Tuesday against Weinstein, saying she was “shocked and appalled by the revelations.”

So far, neither the Clintons nor the Obamas have announced plans to return or donate the funds, like some of their Democratic colleagues.

View user profile

10 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 1:39 pm


Hmmm... wasn't aware that that guy was doing a social experiment. Okay.

I'm sure we can trust him not to edit out any of the people who reacted favorably to him, right? I mean, just because he went into it knowing what results he wanted, that doesn't mean nothin'.

Okay, now debunk all these Nazis yelling "Heil Trump."



Just another "prank"? Richard Spencer doesn't think so.

View user profile

11 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 3:12 pm

If Donald Trump had to return the money of all the pieces of garbage that supported him, he'd go broke and have to sell all his properties.

Politicians aren't responsible for who their donors are or what they do. Not even Donald Trump is responsible for all the KKK members who gave him money. He is responsible for whatever help he got from the Russians though.

And once again, you're condemning Hillary for Bill's actions. I hope none of you people are divorced because if you are, according to your own words, you're responsible for whatever deeds were done to cause it. I don't care if your husbands or wives screwed their brains out with other partners, or multiple partners, or with animals.  If Hillary is responsible for Bill, then you're responsible for whatever your exes did.

That makes sense to you, right?

And the fact that she didn't divorce him makes her a more forgiving person than most divorcees, right?  Forgiving is the Christian way. It's one of those commandments that Jesus made, right?

Your speech doesn't reveal anything about HIllary but it reveals a lot about yourselves. Condemning for the sins of others is BS and you know it.I haven't been in a church in 15 years and I still know it.

View user profile

12 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 3:59 pm

zsomething wrote:

Hmmm... wasn't aware that that guy was doing a social experiment.  Okay.

I'm sure we can trust him not to edit out any of the people who reacted favorably to him, right?  I mean, just because he went into it knowing what results he wanted, that doesn't mean nothin'.

Okay, now debunk all these Nazis yelling "Heil Trump."



Just another "prank"?  Richard Spencer doesn't think so.

Richard Spencer recently went back to Charlottesville with about 3 dozen people. I didn't bother to share it because it appears he's too toxic for his own kind and they're afraid to be associated with him. It's hard to believe that he actually returned to the scene of the crime...no, it's not.

I never even heard of Harvey Weinstein. Why should I? He didn't run for office; he's just a garden variety jerk...did not run for office that I know of. I will agree that he and Drumpf are cut from the same cloth, if it makes you feel better. I did know who Spencer is; I also knew who David Duke was, unlike the liar in chief.

View user profile

13 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 4:38 pm

Floridatexan wrote:

Richard Spencer recently went back to Charlottesville with about 3 dozen people.  I didn't bother to share it because it appears he's too toxic for his own kind and they're afraid to be associated with him.  It's hard to believe that he actually returned to the scene of the crime...no, it's not.  

I never even heard of Harvey Weinstein.  Why should I?  He didn't run for office; he's just a garden variety jerk...did not run for office that I know of.  I will agree that he and Drumpf are cut from the same cloth, if it makes you feel better.  I did know who Spencer is; I also knew who David Duke was, unlike the liar in chief.


Yeah, Spencer snuck in and snuck out... he did it "flash mob" style with just a few of his e-mail buddies so nobody would know about it and show up to oppose them. The alt-right is hurting about their bravery after being outnumbered 1000 to 1 in Boston, so they're trying to do little cowardly things to claim "victory." If they'd announced it anywhere that they were going back to Charlottesville, there'd have been a crowd to meet them. So instead they snuck in, quickly did their stupid stuff, and ran out. It's a silly stunt but they apparently felt they needed it to regain their "white pride."

Yeah, Harvey Weinstein is not a guy most of the public knows about. He's a scumbag, but there's not much reason for the public to have been interested in him, until now. I doubt many of the people he donated to kept up with him, either... he's a big-wig in the movie-making industry, but that's a whole different circle than politics.

View user profile

14 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/11/2017, 5:47 pm

zsomething wrote:


I mean, the only thing worse than being a candidate that Weinstein liked would probably be if there was a candidate who was actually like Weinstein himself. Wouldn't that be awful?  And could you even imagine voting for such a guy?  I mean, Jesus, what kind of a shit-bucket, snot-rocket piece of soulless festering human garbage would a person have to be to actually vote for a Harvey Weinstein type, who felt entitled to just grab women's pussies and stuff?  My god, just think of it!

I can't even picture a person like that.  They'd probably leave a slimy trail when they walked.  Ugh.


This really puts all the sniveling complaints from the holier than thou right wingers into perspective! Really excellent. Let them clutch their pearls and swoon and then look at who they put in the White House. UGH.
[/quote]

View user profile

15 Re: Liberal Avoidance? on 10/12/2017, 1:17 am

othershoe1030 wrote:
zsomething wrote:

I mean, the only thing worse than being a candidate that Weinstein liked would probably be if there was a candidate who was actually like Weinstein himself. Wouldn't that be awful?  And could you even imagine voting for such a guy?  I mean, Jesus, what kind of a shit-bucket, snot-rocket piece of soulless festering human garbage would a person have to be to actually vote for a Harvey Weinstein type, who felt entitled to just grab women's pussies and stuff?  My god, just think of it!

I can't even picture a person like that.  They'd probably leave a slimy trail when they walked.  Ugh.

This really puts all the sniveling complaints from the holier than thou right wingers into perspective! Really excellent. Let them clutch their pearls and swoon and then look at who they put in the White House. UGH.

That says it all, sister.

View user profile

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum