Why has the story about Wasserman-Schultz IT aide being arrested not been posted?

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/fl-reg-wasserman-schultz-aide-arrested-20170725-story.html

Seems important that an IT aide who smashed hard drives and has national democratic secrets elsewhere would be big news. Wonder what his plans were once he went back to Pakistan?

In normal times that story probably would have been posted, but these ain't normal times because witless yokels like you managed to elect a buffoon who makes news nearly every day by tweeting crazy shit that blows up the news cycle.

Please read the criminal complaint which I have given a link. This was about bank fraud. None of what you have posted is true. It is a desperate attempt to connect the fraud of a couple who were getting a bank loan and provided false information about whether one of the homes was a rental property or a primary residence. This attempt to somehow make the Russian investigation go away by idiotic distractions should simply stop if there is going to be an intelligent dialogue, and if people are really American patriots.

http://www.trbas.com/media/media/acrobat/2017-07/70111632278740-26141843.pdf

In normal times that story probably would have been posted, but these ain't normal times because witless yokels like you managed to elect a buffoon who makes news nearly every day by tweeting crazy shit that blows up the news cycle.


Calling another forum member witless when you think this story in normal times would have been posted, creates two witless book ends. People do not even understand the manipulation of headlines. Please read the criminal complaint. It has nothing to do with the headline, nor is this type of story going to be posted as it was because it is a simple lie. The criminal complaint dealt with bank fraud. duh.

2seaoat wrote:  People do not even understand the manipulation of headlines.   Please read the criminal complaint.  It has nothing to do with the headline, nor is this type of story going to be posted as it was because it is a simple lie.   The criminal complaint dealt with bank fraud.  duh.

The headline is misleading but so what? Any discerning adult consumer of news knows that that's pretty standard and you have to read the whole article to find the real story. They are trying to sell newspapers, after all. Even so,  there's plenty in the story to  provoke discussion. Besides, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is a scurvy bitch and deserves anything anyone dishes out.

Only a witless boob would take the headline for the whole story and it's pretty insulting to the original poster to consider him such--even if you might arrive at that conclusion after reading his other posts.

Have a little respect for your fellow forum members, please, we're not all as dumb as you think we are.

Have a little respect for your fellow forum members

I am sorry. Did I offend you calling you witless? By golly nothing but respect from this point forward.

2seaoat wrote:Have a little respect for your fellow forum members

I am sorry.  Did I offend you calling you witless?  By golly nothing but respect from this point forward.

No wonder you spend so much time on the internet, you CAN'T have any friends.

No wonder you spend so much time on the internet, you CAN'T have any friends.


What we are no longer friends. Now I am deeply hurt.

del.capslock wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Have a little respect for your fellow forum members

I am sorry.  Did I offend you calling you witless?  By golly nothing but respect from this point forward.

No wonder you spend so much time on the internet, you CAN'T have any friends.

What is your excuse for being here so much? Let me guess....no life, no friends, and no job.

He is my new friend. I will give him the nickname of "rainman", because that is what friends do. He will no longer be lonely and I will play with him when he gets lonely.

I didn't even know about this...has anyone stopped to consider that this man may be the DNC leaker?

Floridatexan wrote:
I didn't even know about this...has anyone stopped to consider that this man may be the DNC leaker?

But the DNC says it was the Russians. That's good enough for me.

2seaoat wrote:In normal times that story probably would have been posted, but these ain't normal times because witless yokels like you managed to elect a buffoon who makes news nearly every day by tweeting crazy shit that blows up the news cycle.


Calling another forum member witless when you think this story in normal times would have been posted, creates two witless book ends.  People do not even understand the manipulation of headlines.   Please read the criminal complaint.  It has nothing to do with the headline, nor is this type of story going to be posted as it was because it is a simple lie.   The criminal complaint dealt with bank fraud.  duh.

Well since you want an investigation, here ya go-

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-judiciary-committee-votes-to-probe-comey-and-clinton%E2%80%99s-2016-campaign/ar-AAoSRmD?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp

An investigation by the justice department....not another series of political showboating hot dogs.

Joanimaroni wrote:

del.capslock wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Have a little respect for your fellow forum members

I am sorry.  Did I offend you calling you witless?  By golly nothing but respect from this point forward.

No wonder you spend so much time on the internet, you CAN'T have any friends.

What is your excuse for being here so much? Let me guess....no life, no friends, and no job.

No job is right since I sold my business and spend most of my day monitoring my investments.

I come hoping you'll be here so I can get some comic relief by reading your moronic posts.

It's hard to believe a moderator can be so stupid that she doesn't know the difference between slander and libel or even how to spell "content". There's no "X" in it, by the way. I guess we know which one of Seven Dwarfs you are.

No job is right since I sold my business and spend most of my day monitoring my investments.


Good for you.

2seaoat wrote:No job is right since I sold my business and spend most of my day monitoring my investments.


Good for you.

At least we agree on something.

Have occasionally wondered whether one's personally monitoring his investments provides any greater yields and/or capital value over time than not doing so, or than leaving the monitoring to an investment firm. I suppose there've been studies but I'm too lazy (or uninterested) to look them up.

On the other hand, I do realize certain folks just like doing it, regardless. Better you than I.

P.S. Del will you share what type of business you owned? Naturally curious, though NOMB I realize.

Why was it not posted? LOL Why post that when this is so much more funny.

Congratulations, America. "Can Steve Bannon actually suck his own co<k?" is now a reasonable question for White House reporters to ask.

polecat wrote:
Congratulations, America. "Can Steve Bannon actually suck his own cock?" is now a reasonable question for White House reporters to ask.

If he can, God bless him! I hope there's video.

del.capslock wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

del.capslock wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Have a little respect for your fellow forum members

I am sorry.  Did I offend you calling you witless?  By golly nothing but respect from this point forward.

No wonder you spend so much time on the internet, you CAN'T have any friends.

What is your excuse for being here so much? Let me guess....no life, no friends, and no job.

No job is right since I sold my business and spend most of my day monitoring my investments.

I come hoping you'll be here so I can get some comic relief by reading your moronic posts.

It's hard to believe a moderator can be so stupid that she doesn't know the difference between slander and libel or even how to spell "con ent". There's no "X" in it, by the way. I guess we know which one of Seven Dwarfs you are.

Are you sure about the word content?

Joanimaroni wrote:Are you sure about the word content?

Yes I am. Here's your original words:

INAPPROPRIATE CONTEXT REMOVED.

DO NOT POST SLANDEROUS ACCUSATIONS REGARDING POSTERS.

It's the thread that begins: To diehard Trumpions...  posted on 7/16/2017, post #7

del.capslock wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:Are you sure about the word content?

Yes I am. Here's your original words:

INAPPROPRIATE CONTEXT REMOVED.

DO NOT POST SLANDEROUS ACCUSATIONS REGARDING POSTERS.

It's the thread that begins: To diehard Trumpions...  posted on 7/16/2017, post #7

Dammit!

polecat wrote:Why was it not posted? LOL Why post that when this is so much more funny.

Congratulations, America. "Can Steve Bannon actually suck his own co

Wasn't he a contestant on Russia has talent ?