This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Trump Jr.s own words meet a standard for treason

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

2seaoat wrote:Nobody has been executed for constitutional treason in our history as a nation, but when American kids start dying because of traitors who are assisting indirectly a nation who may be killing Americans.......the pichforks will be raised.

I think what would be better would be forfeiture of all his assets so that when Junior gets out of jail he can actually work a job without a silver spoon up his asz.




Nonsense, no member of that family can function without a silver spoon up their ass. Laughing

View user profile
Vikingwoman wrote:Your first paragraph is a nightmare of run on sentences w/ too much side info. that leaves you dazed and confused as to whether you're asking a question or just making statements. Very difficult to read.

Am confused. To whom is this comment directed?

View user profile
Very difficult to read.


Easy to read, difficult to comprehend. There is no "we" consensus on pardons.

View user profile
Wordslinger wrote:
Vikingwoman wrote:Your first paragraph is a nightmare of run on sentences w/ too much side info. that leaves you dazed and confused as to whether you're asking a question or just making statements. Very difficult to read.

Am confused.  To whom is this comment directed?  

I was talking to Oatie on his first paragraph above my post.

View user profile
2seaoat wrote:Very difficult to read.


Easy to read, difficult to comprehend. There is no "we" consensus on pardons.

If you didn't write a whole bunch of gibberish in between your lectures it would be a lot easier to read.

View user profile
Vikingwoman wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Vikingwoman wrote:Your first paragraph is a nightmare of run on sentences w/ too much side info. that leaves you dazed and confused as to whether you're asking a question or just making statements. Very difficult to read.

Am confused.  To whom is this comment directed?  

I was talking to Oatie on his first paragraph above my post.

Thanks for the input.

View user profile
it would be a lot easier to read.


Comprehension is the issue.

View user profile

Maybe this:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2384
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
US Code
Notes
prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

View user profile
2seaoat wrote:it would be a lot easier to read.


Comprehension is the issue.

The problem is your contempt for the reader.

Learn how to use the Preview button and then compose your TERRIBLE writing with an eye towards precision and clarity. Writing is rewriting, you arrogant asshole.

Your latest technique of using BOLD instead of the quote button makes the reader figure out the source of the content you're referring to. It's easier for you and harder for the reader. Wise up!

Read Strunk. OMIT NEEDLESS WORDS! Your wordy stories detract from whatever point you're trying to make. By the time the reader gets to the end, the entire point is lost.

Are you really so self-absorbed that you think YOUR personal experience is universal or even instructive for everyone else?

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/
del.capslock wrote:
2seaoat wrote:it would be a lot easier to read.


Comprehension is the issue.

The problem is your contempt for the reader.

Learn how to use the Preview button and then compose your TERRIBLE writing with an eye towards precision and clarity. Writing is rewriting, you arrogant asshole.

Your latest technique of using BOLD instead of the quote button makes the reader figure out the source of the content you're referring to. It's easier for you and harder for the reader. Wise up!

Read Strunk. OMIT NEEDLESS WORDS! Your wordy stories detract from whatever point you're trying to make. By the time the reader gets to the end, the entire point is lost.

Are you really so self-absorbed that you think YOUR personal experience is universal or even instructive for everyone else?

Read Kerouac. We are all writing from personal experience or from something we've seen or read. Address the content, but don't kill the messenger.

View user profile
del.capslock wrote:
2seaoat wrote:it would be a lot easier to read.


Comprehension is the issue.

The problem is your contempt for the reader.

Learn how to use the Preview button and then compose your TERRIBLE writing with an eye towards precision and clarity. Writing is rewriting, you arrogant asshole.

Your latest technique of using BOLD instead of the quote button makes the reader figure out the source of the content you're referring to. It's easier for you and harder for the reader. Wise up!

Read Strunk. OMIT NEEDLESS WORDS! Your wordy stories detract from whatever point you're trying to make. By the time the reader gets to the end, the entire point is lost.

Are you really so self-absorbed that you think YOUR personal experience is universal or even instructive for everyone else?

Exactly. By the time you get to the end you're eyes are glazed from all the extra tid bits thrown in you don't even remember what the issue was. It's like he's writing a term paper.

View user profile
I love to see that white flag, when substance cannot be challenged and concepts cannot be comprehended. It always results in feeble attempts to kill the messenger. The message remains. Very rarely comprehended.

View user profile
If the messenger can't convey the message there's no point in having concepts.

View user profile

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum