This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.

You are not connected. Please login or register

Marco Rubio Wants Obamacare Repeal With No Replacement

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

The Republicans control every piece of machinery in Washington, D.C., but they've been operating all that powerful hardware like a sketchy bus driver fresh off a five-martini lunch. Last night, their latest attempt to replace Obamacare collapsed. Their only remaining plan, according to Senate Leader Mitch McConnell, is to simply repeal Obamacare with no replacement at all.

That is a spectacularly terrible idea! Experts on both sides of the aisle warn that killing Obamacare outright would destabilize the marketplace, wreak havoc on premiums and eventually leave up to 32 million people without health care if the GOP doesn't eventually come up with a replacement (a feat they've not even come close to pulling off so far).

In fact, one of the only people on Capitol Hill enthused by the idea is our own Sen. Marco Rubio. In a Facebook Live message posted this morning, Rubio said he'd happily vote for an Obamacare repeal with no replacement.

"Senator McConnell, the majority leader, is going to move for a vote to simply repeal Obamacare. I have voted for that in the past, and I would do it again," Rubio said. "I believe Obamacare is broken and I believe it's bad for our country."

Let us count the ways repealing Obamacare with zero plan in place to replace it would be a very bad move.

Of Course Marco Rubio Will Vote for the Obamacare Repeal
Senate Obamacare Repeal Could Cut 78,000 Florida Jobs, $8 Billion From State Economy
Marco Rubio Blames Media "Misinformation" After Terrible Obamacare Repeal Plan's Delay
In the short term, repealing Obamacare — even with a built-in "delay" of up to two years before it fully goes into effect, as the GOP has sometimes advocated — would have immediate repercussions: The insurers who are already shakily propping up exchanges would likely bail en masse . The collateral damage would be hard to predict, and could lead to skyrocketing premiums, mass health care coverage loss, and economic strife.

And that's just in the short term. The real problems would set in if the GOP couldn't come up with a viable replacement in whatever time frame they build for themselves. After the last six months, does anyone truly believe the GOP could pull together a real replacement plan that would pass a full vote — even with a two-year window? And what if they lose control of the Senate or House in the meantime?

Letting Obamacare fully expire with nothing to replace it would be the true nuclear option. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says that would leave as many as 32 million Americans without basic coverage. In Florida — and Miami in particular, which leads the nation in Obamacare enrollees — the effect would be devastating.

Much of Rubio's own party is horrified by this idea. Here's staunchly conservative Rep. Jeff Fortenberry this afternoon: "Repeal with no replacement would be disastrous." By midafternoon, enough GOP Senators had revolted that McConnell will likely have to ditch this idea too.

So why the hell is Rubio backing the plan?

The way he sees it, there are unseen victims of Obamacare no one is talking about. Impoverished families squeezed by states like Florida that refused to expand Medicaid? Rural communities hurt by a concerted effort to tank exchanges?

No! Rubio's real victims are, uh, millennials who don't want insurance but still have to pay big premiums for bad coverage.

"Let me tell you about the people who are 31, 32, 33 years old, who are working hard but they don't have insurance and so they have to pay astronomical figures," Rubio says. "Their copayments are so high, they're basically uninsured... They don't have an organization to protest for them. They're the forgotten people in this debate."

No one is going to argue that our current health care system makes a ton of sense for anyone, much less millennials, many of whom are eking out livings in a gig economy that forces them to piece together scraps of pitifully bad, overpriced health care.

But Rubio's take is that they want that terrible health coverage, and the only crime is they can't pay what it's worth: Not very much.

Marco Rubio's own family has happily benefited from Obamacare. He has also taken $2.5 million in donations from health care interests. Do not trust Marco Rubio's take on health care.



It was Rubio leading the pack when the risk corridors were defunded in 2015.

What a useless piece of trash.

View user profile

View user profile
32 million Americans without insurance......not the 22 million with repeal and replace. Just to help people get moral clarity......the savings taking away health insurance from Americans is about the same amount as the budget increase for the Military. A bargain with the devil.

View user profile
President Trump told Republican senators that if they didn't vote for the healthcare bill, they'd look like dopes. And he combed his neck hair over the top of his head and walked away with his tie dragging on the floor. - Jimmy Fallon

View user profile
Rubio is stupid. Even if he doesn't care about the effect on millions of people (and he doesn't), he should know that this would hit the economy so hard it might collapse it. It's a foolish idea all around, and they're only doing it out of sheer spite and pettiness -- they just want to undo everything Obama did, whether it was a good thing or not. If it had his name on it, they want to take it down. That childish pettiness is gonna start biting them in the ass.

View user profile
Rubio evidently hasn't done any research in Florida, he better hope he doesn't get what he wants, voters retaliate. 1.4 million receiving subsidies in Florida.,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

View user profile
Why would anyone think that when dems give away free shit without a single pub vote that it stands after they've been rejected at every level in the voting booth? It's an odd mental state really... pseudo-enlightenment or flat psychosis? Here's a clue... your subjective ideas about the role of govt are just that... subjective. They've been tried out to their fullest under Obama... and they're now being undone. What part of this isn't clear?

View user profile
and they're now being undone.

Not really. The ACA was modeled after the Heritage conservative think tank. It was tried in Ma under Governor Romney, and people liked it. When President Obama was elected, Republicans gathered and said they would preemptively stop any legislative initiative from the first Black President. They failed on the ACA which their propaganda pointed out everything which was bad, but said nothing that was good.

They said nobody would enroll. They did. They said health care inflation would grow under the ACA at a greater rate. It did not. They said people would have huge raises in premiums. They did not with the subsidy.

They then promised to repeal the ACA and replace it with something better. They had seven years to plan the legislative replacement. They won the house, the senate, and the presidency. They then found out that close to 85% of the people liked the ACA. Propaganda does not equal truth. The wealthy tax cut is fully understood across America, and the understanding among middle class people that elderly and disabled parents who were productive citizens could in nursing home placements after all their worldly assets have been applied to monthly bills get thrown out on the street if medicaid is reduced by 1/3 because nursing homes can not cover that gap and unless American families do, the horrors would begin.

Sometimes losing an election allows America to wake up to the truth of what the agenda is of the Oligarchy. I never thought the house would be at play in 2018.

View user profile

Sponsored content

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum