Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Democratic leaders now trying to calm their spun up masses

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

https://theintercept.com/2017/03/16/key-democratic-officials-now-warning-base-not-to-expect-evidence-of-trumprussia-collusion/

del.capslock

del.capslock

Waiting wrote:Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

https://theintercept.com/2017/03/16/key-democratic-officials-now-warning-base-not-to-expect-evidence-of-trumprussia-collusion/

You're so full of shit! This article is from back in MARCH!

Things have changed a bit since then, you stupid putz!

Nice try, asshole.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

Waiting wrote:Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

https://theintercept.com/2017/03/16/key-democratic-officials-now-warning-base-not-to-expect-evidence-of-trumprussia-collusion/

We don't know according to Brennan whether there was collusion or not however today we learn that there was at the very least a lot of contact between the Trump campaign and Russians.

Whether or not actual collusion can be proved is one thing, a high bar but the question still remains: Why is Trump so in love with Putin and all things Russian? Does it really matter if there was collusion or not? I don't think so. I think there are plenty of other entanglements from personal business dealings, money laundering, oil deals, lifting of sanctions etc. to sink the Trump ship of state. The corruption of this gang of thug billionaires is not limited to mere political collusion but grows like kudzu over the whole administration.


Washington (CNN)Former CIA Director John Brennan told House Russia investigators Tuesday that Russia "brazenly interfered" in US elections, including actively contacting members of the President Donald Trump's campaign -- but he stopped shy of dubbing it "collusion."

"I saw interaction that in my mind raised questions of whether it was collusion," Brennan told Rep. Trey Gowdy, saying that he supported the FBI digging further. "It was necessary to pull threads."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/23/politics/john-brennan-house-intelligence-committee/

Guest


Guest

del.capslock wrote:
Waiting wrote:Key Democratic Officials Now Warning Base Not to Expect Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion

https://theintercept.com/2017/03/16/key-democratic-officials-now-warning-base-not-to-expect-evidence-of-trumprussia-collusion/

You're so full of shit! This article is from back in MARCH!

Things have changed a bit since then, you stupid putz!

Nice try, asshole.

Such vitriol when faced with the facts.

del.capslock

del.capslock

Waiting wrote:

Such vitriol when faced with the facts.  

They are no longer current, you doofus. It's the same as using dead guy's medical history from before he died to describe his present condition.

"Uh, well it says here he's just got bronchitis."

                                                                    DUH!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

Guest


Guest

del.capslock wrote:
Waiting wrote:

Such vitriol when faced with the facts.  

They are no longer current, you doofus. It's the same as using dead guy's medical history from before he died to describe his present condition.

"Uh, well it says here he's just got bronchitis."

                                                                    DUH!

Current enough troll.

PkrBum

PkrBum

Hillary's team met with the Russian contact too... but if she'd won they wouldn't give a damn.

You know it's true. And her history with russia along with her husband and slushfund foundation is sorted.

Sal

Sal

PkrBum wrote:Hillary's team met with the Russian contact too... but if she'd won they wouldn't give a damn.

You know it's true. And her history with russia along with her husband and slushfund foundation is sorted.

Dayum ...

... you really are grade A, high-octane stupid.

PkrBum

PkrBum

Sal wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Hillary's team met with the Russian contact too... but if she'd won they wouldn't give a damn.

You know it's true. And her history with russia along with her husband and slushfund foundation is sorted.

Dayum ...

... you really are grade A, high-octane stupid.

It's true dimwit... and the reason it irritates you is that you know it's true too.

If i thght it'd work I'd tell you to be honest... but that's not possible.

del.capslock

del.capslock

Waiting wrote:
Current enough troll.

No, not current enough, you dumb shit.

Just since that article was first posted we've had:


  • Kushner failing to report meetings with Russians,
    The Nunes/White House mess,
    WaPo reporting Trump tried to stifle Yates,
    Senate committee denies Flynn immunity,
    The Pentagon announces that it's investigating Flynn,
    The House Ethics committee announcing an investigation of Nunes,
    Discovery of Manafort's secret Ukraine ledger,
    Discovery of Flynn's payment from RT,
    Trump firing of Comey,
    Trump admitting on TV that the Russia thing was on his mind.


Look, the list goes on-and-on.

Your post was NOT current, it was bullshit and you are bullshit.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

Sal

Sal

PkrBum wrote:
Sal wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Hillary's team met with the Russian contact too... but if she'd won they wouldn't give a damn.

You know it's true. And her history with russia along with her husband and slushfund foundation is sorted.

Dayum ...

... you really are grade A, high-octane stupid.

It's true dimwit... and the reason it irritates you is that you know it's true too.

If i thght it'd work I'd tell you to be honest... but that's not possible.

Wrong again, bonehead.

There is no allegation that Russians tried to influence the election in any way in Clinton's favor, there was no "Clinton slush fund", and it's "sordid" not "sorted".

Sheesh ...

Guest


Guest

del.capslock wrote:
Waiting wrote:
Current enough troll.

No, not current enough, you dumb shit.

Just since that article was first posted we've had:


  • Kushner failing to report meetings with Russians,
    The Nunes/White House mess,
    WaPo reporting Trump tried to stifle Yates,
    Senate committee denies Flynn immunity,
    The Pentagon announces that it's investigating Flynn,
    The House Ethics committee announcing an investigation of Nunes,
    Discovery of Manafort's secret Ukraine ledger,
    Discovery of Flynn's payment from RT,
    Trump firing of Comey,
    Trump admitting on TV that the Russia thing was on his mind.


Look, the list goes on-and-on.

Your post was NOT current, it was bullshit and you are bullshit.

I think with this post, you have lived up to the title by the original post. Thanks for your help on this.

del.capslock

del.capslock

Waiting wrote:
I think with this post, you have lived up to the title by the original post.  

I realize it's a struggle, but at least try to post comments that make sense. Perhaps you can get an adult to help you with this stuff.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum