In Trump Nation, the response to the lies about the Russians earned the response of Meh

PkrBum wrote:Good... learn nothing... ignore the populace... talk social justice but pander to the wealthy elite.

Great strategy comrade.

Waiting wrote:That doesn't parlay well for Democrats who are busy slinging so much mud and hoping something sticks that they have forgotten to realize that they aren't in power anymore and won't be for a very long time.  The left and the mainstream media has an inclusive suicide pact that doesn't end well for them.  Folks have caught on to the absolute tizzy fit being pitched by the party that rigged the election against Sanders for Hillary and the fact that they cannot accept the idea that their policies, aside from the inner cities, have been rejected wholesale by an America that withered away under the last commander-in-chief.

People want to say Trump is for the 1%. HAHHAHAH. How much wealth was gained under the last president for the 1% in the eight years prior to Trump? How many billionaires were made with Obama in charge?

No wars were ended by the last administration. There was just a pause between our sending troops for a bit and then it began ramping back up, yet if Trump shoots 60 cruise missiles, something another Democratic president once did years ago and almost wiped out the stockpile, then he is the devil?

We actually expanded our footprint across the world with combat troops and advisors in places most of you could not find without Google.  Syria, Jordan, and some places in Southeast Asia are the simple places to find, but there is more and it was all done under the last administration.

And then there is Russia allegedly screwing with the elections.  Really? Did some Russians come over here and persuade people to vote for Trump? Did they force people to vote under duress?  Is it the fault of Trump that Hillary was so power hungry and money hungry that she used her position as Secretary of State to enrich her family at the cost of the entire world for what many believed would be favors owed as she ascended to the Presidency? It seems she and the Democrats overplayed their hands.  Nobody wanted Hillary as President but establishment Democrats and people owed favors for the donations they made to a sham foundation that stole billions from a nation like Haiti in a dire time of need. The Democrats best shot was with Sanders who was brushed aside and then sucked up to Hillary on each debate saying, "...we're tired of the damn questions Madame Secretary."  Well, the rest of America who put Trump into power is tired of the BS that began the day after Trump was elected.  They are tired of the Democrats playing Americans off against each other with race and class warfare.  Nothing in the Constitution claims that equal opportunity has to match an equal outcome.

Dems, if the army you are raising to try and subvert the government is made up of people living in their parents basement's who would rather play X-Box, PlayStation or need a safe space and you expect those to be the next version of Hitler's Brown Shirts (Antifa, Occupy, New Black Panthers, BLM...), this civil war you are fomenting will be over as soon as it starts. And yes, the Democratic party is fomenting a civil war due to the fact that they lost an election they should have won, but they ran the wrong candidate told to them by their establishment and the world powers who were owed favors by Hillary.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-country-on-leak-charges-meh/ar-BBBdpd1?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp

Waiting wrote:This is funny.

Putin calls the political left "schizophrenic."


Complaining about what he said were signs of "political schizophrenia" in the United States, Putin said Trump was not being allowed to do his job properly.

"It's hard to imagine what else can these people who generate such nonsense and rubbish can dream up next," said Putin.

And finally,

"What surprises me is that they are shaking up the domestic political situation using anti-Russian slogans. Either they don't understand the damage they're doing to their own country, in which case they are simply stupid, or they understand everything, in which case they are dangerous and corrupt."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-putin-idUSKCN18D1EA?il=0

PkrBum wrote:

del.capslock wrote:Your comments about Russian interference in the election demonstrate a lack of understanding of what happened and what the controversy is. Imagine that.

Understanding? There's no understanding yet... and there likely won't be. Speculation isn't understanding.

Silly comrade... lol.

PkrBum wrote:Cliff notes? What are you... seagoat2?

del.capslock wrote:

Waiting wrote:That doesn't parlay well for Democrats who are busy slinging so much mud and hoping something sticks that they have forgotten to realize that they aren't in power anymore and won't be for a very long time.  The left and the mainstream media has an inclusive suicide pact that doesn't end well for them.  Folks have caught on to the absolute tizzy fit being pitched by the party that rigged the election against Sanders for Hillary and the fact that they cannot accept the idea that their policies, aside from the inner cities, have been rejected wholesale by an America that withered away under the last commander-in-chief.

People want to say Trump is for the 1%. HAHHAHAH. How much wealth was gained under the last president for the 1% in the eight years prior to Trump? How many billionaires were made with Obama in charge?

No wars were ended by the last administration. There was just a pause between our sending troops for a bit and then it began ramping back up, yet if Trump shoots 60 cruise missiles, something another Democratic president once did years ago and almost wiped out the stockpile, then he is the devil?

We actually expanded our footprint across the world with combat troops and advisors in places most of you could not find without Google.  Syria, Jordan, and some places in Southeast Asia are the simple places to find, but there is more and it was all done under the last administration.

And then there is Russia allegedly screwing with the elections.  Really? Did some Russians come over here and persuade people to vote for Trump? Did they force people to vote under duress?  Is it the fault of Trump that Hillary was so power hungry and money hungry that she used her position as Secretary of State to enrich her family at the cost of the entire world for what many believed would be favors owed as she ascended to the Presidency? It seems she and the Democrats overplayed their hands.  Nobody wanted Hillary as President but establishment Democrats and people owed favors for the donations they made to a sham foundation that stole billions from a nation like Haiti in a dire time of need. The Democrats best shot was with Sanders who was brushed aside and then sucked up to Hillary on each debate saying, "...we're tired of the damn questions Madame Secretary."  Well, the rest of America who put Trump into power is tired of the BS that began the day after Trump was elected.  They are tired of the Democrats playing Americans off against each other with race and class warfare.  Nothing in the Constitution claims that equal opportunity has to match an equal outcome.

Dems, if the army you are raising to try and subvert the government is made up of people living in their parents basement's who would rather play X-Box, PlayStation or need a safe space and you expect those to be the next version of Hitler's Brown Shirts (Antifa, Occupy, New Black Panthers, BLM...), this civil war you are fomenting will be over as soon as it starts. And yes, the Democratic party is fomenting a civil war due to the fact that they lost an election they should have won, but they ran the wrong candidate told to them by their establishment and the world powers who were owed favors by Hillary.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-country-on-leak-charges-meh/ar-BBBdpd1?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp

Here we go again, the same old reactionary drivel: HILLARY! OBAMA! OBAMA! HILLARY!  

.

del.capslock wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

del.capslock wrote:Your comments about Russian interference in the election demonstrate a lack of understanding of what happened and what the controversy is. Imagine that.

Understanding? There's no understanding yet... and there likely won't be. Speculation isn't understanding.

Silly comrade... lol.

No understanding, huh?

Are you familiar with The National Review, the conservative, semi-monthly magazine? It's been referred to as "the bible of American conservatism".

Well, they had an article in one of their issues. Do you know what I mean when I say article in a magazine? Usually that's a piece of written prose about a particular subject. It has lots of words.

In the ones grown-ups read, in order to understand what all the words mean, the reading comprehension skills required may exceed those of a fifth-grade child, so I suppose you're not really very familiar with them.

In this grown-up magazine, The National Review, they had an article called "A Beginner’s Guide to the Trump/Russia Controversy".

In that article--ask a grown-up to read it to you--there was a section about the recent election sub-titled "Well, if the Russians didn't "hack" the election, what did they do?"

In that section, there were these words:

"They sowed confusion and chaos, and there’s strong evidence (according to multiple intelligence agencies) that they ultimately sought to help Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton. Their most infamous move was the theft of e-mails from the Democratic National Committee, which were likely passed to WikiLeaks before becoming the basis of a slow drip of damaging information about Clinton and the Democratic party released into the news cycle.

"At the same time, Russia was allegedly using “trolls” and “bots” to impact the news cycle by creating artificial “surges” of commentary online. They also used propaganda outlets such as RT to try to affect the national debate, and intentionally tried to plant certain ideas and themes into the American electorate’s consciousness, including the notion that the election was “rigged” against Trump (a theme Trump himself picked up)."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446339/donald-trump-russia-2016-election-controversy-explained

So, see, little PkrBoy, there really is understanding of what happened. And it doesn't matter if it affected the outcome of the election, it's the fact that it happened that is so bad.

Waiting wrote:
Given that 99% of the mainstream media is liberal leaning, are you saying that the liberal side participated in ensuring Hillary wasn't elected? That's rich.

Waiting wrote:
Given that 99% of the mainstream media is liberal leaning, are you saying that the liberal side participated in ensuring Hillary wasn't elected? That's rich.

Sal wrote:

Waiting wrote:
Given that 99% of the mainstream media is liberal leaning, are you saying that the liberal side participated in ensuring Hillary wasn't elected? That's rich.

A little touched in the brainpan, aren't ya?

"99% of the mainstream media is liberal leaning"??

Hahahahaha ...

No Poindexter, 99% of the mainstream media is profit-driven, corporatist leaning.

Thus the astounding amount of free press given to Trump, and thus the remarkable disparity of time spent on the Clinton email non-story compared to all policy discussions combined.

Welcome to reality.

del.capslock wrote:

Waiting wrote:
Given that 99% of the mainstream media is liberal leaning, are you saying that the liberal side participated in ensuring Hillary wasn't elected? That's rich.

99%, huh? How about backing that up with some facts.

This is more bullshit from the right. They're nothing but a bunch of crybabies squealing that "things aren't fair!"

Talk's cheap, asshole. Now back it up with hard evidence.

And hurry it up, mommy's coming home and you know she doesn't like it when you use her computer without permission.

Waiting wrote:

del.capslock wrote:

Waiting wrote:
Given that 99% of the mainstream media is liberal leaning, are you saying that the liberal side participated in ensuring Hillary wasn't elected? That's rich.

99%, huh? How about backing that up with some facts.

This is more bullshit from the right. They're nothing but a bunch of crybabies squealing that "things aren't fair!"

Talk's cheap, asshole. Now back it up with hard evidence.

And hurry it up, mommy's coming home and you know she doesn't like it when you use her computer without permission.

With Fox gone to the liberals, it's almost 100%. There are no conservative news organizations. Especially on TV where most of you folks get your propaganda.

del.capslock wrote:

Waiting wrote:

del.capslock wrote:

Waiting wrote:
Given that 99% of the mainstream media is liberal leaning, are you saying that the liberal side participated in ensuring Hillary wasn't elected? That's rich.

99%, huh? How about backing that up with some facts.

This is more bullshit from the right. They're nothing but a bunch of crybabies squealing that "things aren't fair!"

Talk's cheap, asshole. Now back it up with hard evidence.

And hurry it up, mommy's coming home and you know she doesn't like it when you use her computer without permission.

With Fox gone to the liberals, it's almost 100%. There are no conservative news organizations. Especially on TV where most of you folks get your propaganda.

Not to worry, kid. You'll still have right-wing crazy drivel like OpsLens and SilenceIsConsent to amuse you. Fake news is better than no news at all, eh?

Your suckbuddy Trump is toast. Rosenstein just appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as Special Counsel to investigate the Trump/Russia debacle.

Buh-bye, sonny boy.

zsomething wrote:Wow, look at all the horseshit.  

It's got everything  -- the "rigged against Sanders" horseshit, the "America withered away under Obama" horseshit (and whoo, that is a big fucking pile if you've, y'know, actually compared the real data on anything), the jab at "inner cities" (sucks that ya can't say the n-word anymore, doesn't it?).   Then there's the stuff about Russia "allegedly" screwing with elections (like that's still in any doubt), the "no one wanted Hillary as president" horseshit (because the 3 million more who voted for her are all illegals -- Donnie The Liar says so!), the "Democrats are doing race and class warfare" horseshit, the "Democrats are the real Nazis" horseshit, and, of course, the "all Democrats live in their parents' basement and play video games all day" horseshit.  And, my absolute favorite, the "civil war will be over in no time because Dems are all weak and unarmed" fantasy horseshit.  

It's gonna be hilarious, seeing the look on somebody's face when they actually show up at my house in their neo-Confederate uniform for their "drag the liberals to the curb and kill 'em" pogrom when they get a look at what they'll be staring down the barrel of.  Too bad I won't get to look at it long.

You keep right on believin' the stuff you're belivin', budreaux.   You're fighting cardboard characters you've made up in your own mind, and have no freakin' idea about reality.  And, according to Sun Tzu, that fast-tracks you for losing.

Provided you are that dumb, for reals, and this isn't just some chain-yankin' character you're playing online to provoke a reaction,  In which case, well played.

If you actually do believe all that stuff, though, I know a certain exiled Nigerian prince who's just gonna love you.   But, if you voted for Trump, I'm sure that prince already has your simple ass on speed dial.

PkrBum wrote:Sooo... the talkingpoint now is that the dnc didn't rig against Sanders... the dem party flourished under Obama... that Hillary is just shy of mother Teresa... that there is no "social justice" agenda... that the dems created the kkk but the pubs are to blame for racism... etc. Good work comrades... lol.

zsomething wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Sooo... the talkingpoint now is that the dnc didn't rig against Sanders... the dem party flourished under Obama... that Hillary is just shy of mother Teresa... that there is no "social justice" agenda... that the dems created the kkk but the pubs are to blame for racism... etc. Good work comrades... lol.

Nah, not a talking point, just what I think about things.

Nope, things weren't "rigged" against Sanders. It was a hotly contested primary, both sides fought hard (and sometimes a little nasty), and more people voted for Hillary than Bernie. That's not "rigging," that's the breaks.

.

zsomething wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Sooo... the talkingpoint now is that the dnc didn't rig against Sanders... the dem party flourished under Obama... that Hillary is just shy of mother Teresa... that there is no "social justice" agenda... that the dems created the kkk but the pubs are to blame for racism... etc. Good work comrades... lol.

Nah, not a talking point, just what I think about things.

Nope, things weren't "rigged" against Sanders.  It was a hotly contested primary, both sides fought hard (and sometimes a little nasty), and more people voted for Hillary than Bernie.  That's not "rigging," that's the breaks.