This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

I'd be honored to meet Kim Jong Un.

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Says heir tRump...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ng-north-korea

Quite a gaggle of rogues we have going here...


View user profile
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/may/21/next-defining-campaign-issue/

"Would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?"

"I would," Obama said. "And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration — is ridiculous."

"So, you know, for all their tough talk, one of the things you have to ask yourself is: What are George Bush and John McCain afraid of? Demanding that a country meets all your conditions before you meet with them, that's not a strategy; it's just naive, wishful thinking. I'm not afraid that we'll lose some propaganda fight with a dictator."

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/may/21/next-defining-campaign-issue/

"Would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?"

"I would," Obama said. "And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration — is ridiculous."

"So, you know, for all their tough talk, one of the things you have to ask yourself is: What are George Bush and John McCain afraid of? Demanding that a country meets all your conditions before you meet with them, that's not a strategy; it's just naive, wishful thinking. I'm not afraid that we'll lose some propaganda fight with a dictator."

You post a NINE year old article and think somehow that's relevant to today?

Where was N. Korea's nuclear program at the time? How about it's ballistic missile capability? Here's the big one: WHO WAS THE LEADER OF THE COUNTRY BACK THEN?

This may come as a great shock to you but things change, outcomes are uncertain, circumstances are complex. What pertained in 2008 is no longer pertinent.

You're full of shit, PkrBitch, and you're getting pathological with your Obama obsession. Get some help.

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/
What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means. Have you ever even read a serious non-fiction book, a history or a biography written by someone with real credentials?

Just like the rest of Trump's core supporters, you're a combination of ignorance and belligerence. You're too ignorant to understand the great wide world and it pisses you off because things ain't perfect. What a moron!

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/
It's one thing to meet with leaders to reach diplomatic objectives. It is entirely another thing to lavish praise and admiration on murderous dictators.

View user profile
othershoe1030 wrote:It's one thing to meet with leaders to reach diplomatic objectives. It is entirely another thing to lavish praise and admiration on murderous dictators.

Or invite them to the White House.

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

The word "reactionary" has a meaning different from the word "reaction".

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē

adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative;

noun
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist
;

You're just not very well read or educated, are you? It's okay, we'll make allowances for your self-inflicted ignorance, sparky.

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/
othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

Nice google definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reactionary

Opposing political or social progress or reform.
‘reactionary attitudes toward women's rights’

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

Nice google definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reactionary

Opposing political or social progress or reform.
‘reactionary attitudes toward women's rights’

Good grief! You prove our point!

The word "reactionary" has a meaning different from the word "reaction".

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

Nice google definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reactionary

Opposing political or social progress or reform.
‘reactionary attitudes toward women's rights’

The only difference is that the Oxford recognizes that "Social Liberalization"
is actually "Social Progress"!

                       LOL!

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/
othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

Nice google definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reactionary

Opposing political or social progress or reform.
‘reactionary attitudes toward women's rights’

Good grief! You prove our point!

The word "reactionary" has a meaning different from the word "reaction".

Oh no... I've used your word and applied it to leftists. That really pisses y'all off apparently... lol.

Tough shit.

View user profile
I gotta quit this thread. It's just not fair, it's like kicking a three-legged dog.

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/
Just admit it. A position that you adored from Obama... you condemn from trump... for partisan bs.

View user profile
del.capslock wrote:I gotta quit this thread. It's just not fair, it's like kicking a three-legged dog.

It's called "alternative definitions"?

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/may/21/next-defining-campaign-issue/

"Would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?"

"I would," Obama said. "And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration — is ridiculous."

"So, you know, for all their tough talk, one of the things you have to ask yourself is: What are George Bush and John McCain afraid of? Demanding that a country meets all your conditions before you meet with them, that's not a strategy; it's just naive, wishful thinking. I'm not afraid that we'll lose some propaganda fight with a dictator."

inconsequential. Ancient story. Totally irrelevant to tRump today. One might say... Apples & oranges.

How deep did you have to dig to come up with nothing? LOL! Laughing

View user profile
It's impressive what leftists can ignore to groupthink... and your dear leaders count on it.

Congratulations comrades... you're very useful.

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:It's impressive what leftists can ignore to groupthink... and your dear leaders count on it.

Congratulations comrades... you're very useful.

You are almost as much out of touch with reality as your orange idol.

1st order of a discussion is= Stay relevant. Rolling Eyes

View user profile
Offering to talk through diplomatic channels is normal.

Praising brutally thuggish dictators and inviting them to the White House is not.

Once again, Pkr proves to be the master of mindless false equivalencies.  

View user profile
When y'all have to use pejoratives and call it mindless or irrelevant it just confirms my point.

Y'all had nothing but praise and adoration when Obama did nearly the same damn thing.

Lol... it's transparent. None of you can deviate from the groupthink... or even acknowledge the truth.

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:When y'all have to use pejoratives and call it mindless or irrelevant it just confirms my point.

Y'all had nothing but praise and adoration when Obama did nearly the same damn thing.

Lol... it's transparent. None of you can deviate from the groupthink... or even acknowledge the truth.

There's no equivalence, dumbass.

Not even close.

View user profile
Sal wrote:
PkrBum wrote:When y'all have to use pejoratives and call it mindless or irrelevant it just confirms my point.

Y'all had nothing but praise and adoration when Obama did nearly the same damn thing.

Lol... it's transparent. None of you can deviate from the groupthink... or even acknowledge the truth.

There's no equivalence, dumbass.

Not even close.

Riiiiiiiiiight... lol.

View user profile

View user profile

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum