This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

UK spy documents: Trump Organization paid Russian hackers who took orders from Putin

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Last December, the U.K. government was reportedly given extensive records of Trump campaign officials’ interactions with the Kremlin.

The Guardian reported former MI6 agent Christopher Steele’s infamous dossier about possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia was first given to the UK intelligence services. These documents reportedly contain records of payments from the Russian campaign to banks of Russian cyber trolls tasked with spreading disinformation ahead of the 2016 election.

Court filings confirmed earlier this month that Steele passed along the information because he felt it was “of considerable importance in relation to alleged Russian interference in the US presidential election.”

Steele outlined how four Trump campaign representatives traveled to Prague in the Czech Republic in August or September to have “secret discussions with Kremlin representatives and associated operators/hackers.” The group discussed how they would pay hackers for breaking into the Democratic Party’s computers and developing a “contingency plans for covering up operations.”

The memo reported that hackers were paid by the Trump Organization, however, the hackers were under the direction of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen is said to have attended the meeting in Prague, though he has described the memo as “totally fake, totally inaccurate.” He also claimed he’d never been to Prague.

Steele produced 16 memos using Russian sources to describe the web of collusion between Trump aides and Russian intelligence or other officials. A copy of the memos was given to the news outlet Fusion but instructed them not to disclose the material to anyone without approval. They agreed and Steele agreed to provide a copy to Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) after McCain learned the memos existed from the UK ambassador to Moscow.

The Guardian reports that the court documents revealed Steele continued to get “unsolicited intelligence” on the links between Trump and Russia. As a result, Steele drew up another memo from Dec. 13. He turned that memo to a senior British national security official and gave encrypted versions to Fusion to give to McCain.

Court statements argue Steele was under an obligation to give the information to the UK and US “at a high level by persons with responsibility for national security.” However, Steele said he never gave a copy to any news organizations, merely off-the-record briefings about the dossier to some journalists in the fall of 2016. They argue they had no involvement in BuzzFeed’s decision to publish the document.




http://www.rawstory.com/2017/04/uk-given-memos-indicating-the-trump-organization-paid-russia-hackers-report/

View user profile
Pretty damming stuff if all is true.

View user profile
All innuendo and not ONE fact. I can wait until the indictment. This has become the flip side of the manufactured hearings concerning Hillary Clinton where people yelled lock her up without a scintilla of evidence that she had broke the law. I can wait for an indictment. No problem with a couple hearings because it will make the public aware what a monster Putin has become.

View user profile
You use "UK" as if this person still represented the UK and these are actual intelligence docs...

that's propaganda.

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:You use "UK" as if this person still represented the UK and these are actual intelligence docs...

that's propaganda.

I know that reading real words is more than a challenge for you Pkrbum, but if you had tried to read the link provided in the first comment of this thread you would have seen the following:

"[b]The Guardian reported former MI6 agent Christopher Steele’s infamous dossier about possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia was first given to the UK intelligence services. These documents reportedly contain records of payments from the Russian campaign to banks of Russian cyber trolls tasked with spreading disinformation ahead of the 2016 election."


What part of the sentence "was first given to the UK intelligence services." Do you find incomprehensible?

View user profile
Wordslinger wrote:
What part of the sentence "was first given to the UK intelligence services." Do you find incomprehensible?

Probably all of it.

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/
It's fake... full of unnamed sources and purposefully unverifiable fiction... with many blatant falsehoods. I doubt it was even written by the "former" spy... it doesn't read as if english is the authors first language.

View user profile
Joe my neighbor got a new car. He was laid off two years ago. People have been coming over to his house late at night. I think he is a drug dealer. I tell the police chief.....Joe is a drug dealer. The local newspaper has a source that speaks with a reporter. Joe is believed to be a drug dealer. The police chief has been watching him. The reporter prints a story leaving out most of the details, but talking about how could somebody with a new car who has not worked in two years, not be doing something Illegal.

This logic was used against Hillary Clinton, and was obscene. Now this logic is being used against President Trump. Nothing would make me happier than President Trump never having been elected, but to do what was done to Hillary with innuendo and unfounded new standards of criminality, is equally obscene.

I can wait for the indictment of those people who have illegally been working for the Russian Government and attempting to interfere with the 2016 election.

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:It's fake... full of unnamed sources and purposefully unverifiable fiction... with many blatant falsehoods. I doubt it was even written by the "former" spy... it doesn't read as if english is the authors first language.

But comrade, what if IT IS true? What say ye then?

View user profile
panhandler wrote:
PkrBum wrote:It's fake... full of unnamed sources and purposefully unverifiable fiction... with many blatant falsehoods. I doubt it was even written by the "former" spy... it doesn't read as if english is the authors first language.

But comrade, what if IT IS true?  What say ye then?

Hang em... just like i propose for any infraction by govt employees that lie or are corrupt.

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:
panhandler wrote:
PkrBum wrote:It's fake... full of unnamed sources and purposefully unverifiable fiction... with many blatant falsehoods. I doubt it was even written by the "former" spy... it doesn't read as if english is the authors first language.

But comrade, what if IT IS true?  What say ye then?

Hang em... just like i propose for any infraction by govt employees that lie or are corrupt.

There's hope for you after all. Wink

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:
Hang em... just like i propose for any infraction by govt employees that lie or are corrupt.

Does that include cops who routinely lie to cover-up the unnecessary brutality or other wrongful acts of fellow cops, the "Blue Wall"? Should we hang them as well?

Hell, that'd decimate the police forces in most large American cities. Is that what you propose?

View user profile http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

http://www.palmerreport.com/politics/nbc-trump-pence-flynn/2494/

NBC News confirms Donald Trump, Mike Pence, Jeff Sessions all lied about vetting Michael Flynn

"Michael Flynn just became an even bigger problem for Donald Trump and several key players in his administration. As it’s gradually come to light that Flynn had been on the take from Russia and Turkey during the campaign, and that the government had warned him not to do so years ago, the Trump White House floated the claim that it hadn’t bothered to vet Flynn because he had already been vetted by the Obama administration. But that’s now blowing back on them in a big way.

It was already bizarre for the Trump administration to claim that it had relied on the Obama administration’s prior vetting of Michael Flynn, as Obama fired Flynn back in 2014. That alone should have logically warranted Flynn being subsequently re-vetted when the Trump White House decided to make him the National Security Adviser this year..."

(video)

View user profile
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Hang em... just like i propose for any infraction by govt employees that lie or are corrupt.

Does that include cops who routinely lie to cover-up the unnecessary brutality or other wrongful acts of fellow cops, the "Blue Wall"? Should we hang them as well?

Hell, that'd decimate the police forces in most large American cities. Is that what you propose?

To include abuse of power... at any level.

View user profile
2seaoat wrote:Joe my neighbor got a new car.  He was laid off two years ago.  People have been coming over to his house late at night.  I think he is a drug dealer.   I tell the police chief.....Joe is a drug dealer.   The local newspaper has a source that speaks with a reporter.   Joe is believed to be a drug dealer.   The police chief has been watching him.   The reporter prints a story leaving out most of the details, but talking about how could somebody with a new car who has not worked in two years, not be doing something Illegal.

This logic was used against Hillary Clinton, and was obscene.   Now this logic is being used against President Trump.   Nothing would make me happier than President Trump never having been elected, but to do what was done to Hillary with innuendo and unfounded new standards of criminality, is equally obscene.

I can wait for the indictment of those people who have illegally been working for the Russian Government and attempting to interfere with the 2016 election.

Meanwhile, do you plan to ignore all the evidence...even when it's in plain sight?



View user profile
Floridatexan wrote:Meanwhile, do you plan to ignore all the evidence...even when it's in plain sight?

See: fast n furious, Obamacaid lies and deceptions, media wiretapping, benghazi lies, irs targeting, secret server and related lies, Clinton slushfund and foreign donations (including Russia)... etc.

Did you once demand transparency and accountability?

View user profile
PkrBum wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:Meanwhile, do you plan to ignore all the evidence...even when it's in plain sight?

See: fast n furious, Obamacaid lies and deceptions, media wiretapping, benghazi lies, irs targeting, secret server and related lies, Clinton slushfund and foreign donations (including Russia)... etc.

Did you once demand transparency and accountability?

View user profile

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum