True meaning of "FORWARD"

[img][/img]

ROFLMAO

othershoe1030 wrote:

What happened to the chart going back to 2000?

I'm not sure that is something you want to boast about. I take it that you realize it takes 150,000 new jobs per month, just to keep even with population growth. I'm not sure if that includes the illegal aliens.

So please pull up the chart from 2000 and post that one and let's talk.

Average monthly private sector job growth during Bush's tenure: -7,000 jobs.

1st term: +22,000 per month
2nd term: -53,000 per month

Removing the first two years since we're gonna hear about 9-11, private sector job growth was only +33,000 per month.

Obama 1st term: +10,000

Remove 1st year due to economic crisis: +143,000
Remove 1st two years: +166,000

With that in mind, we looked at unemployment rates and found that Obama’s numbers are still worse than those of his predecessor. Bush’s average monthly unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, compared to 9.2 percent for the current president.

Let’s see what happens when we credit Bush with the entire period of the Great Recession, which ended in June 2009. He still fares better, averaging an unemployment rate of 5.4 percent, compared to Obama’s 9.3 percent after the economic downturn

Rogue wrote:With that in mind, we looked at unemployment rates and found that Obama’s numbers are still worse than those of his predecessor. Bush’s average monthly unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, compared to 9.2 percent for the current president.

Let’s see what happens when we credit Bush with the entire period of the Great Recession, which ended in June 2009. He still fares better, averaging an unemployment rate of 5.4 percent, compared to Obama’s 9.3 percent after the economic downturn

If you cut and paste something, at least give them credit!

Margin Call wrote:

Rogue wrote:With that in mind, we looked at unemployment rates and found that Obama’s numbers are still worse than those of his predecessor. Bush’s average monthly unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, compared to 9.2 percent for the current president.

Let’s see what happens when we credit Bush with the entire period of the Great Recession, which ended in June 2009. He still fares better, averaging an unemployment rate of 5.4 percent, compared to Obama’s 9.3 percent after the economic downturn

If you cut and paste something, at least give them credit!

The Pinocchio Test


There’s no doubt that Bush owns an unimpressive record on job creation. But Obama comes in either last, second-to-last or in the bottom half among presidents since the Great Depression, depending on which way you look at the numbers.

The president said that policies from 2000 through 2008 produced the “most sluggish job growth we’ve ever seen.” Perhaps so, but the worst numbers on record occurred under his watch.

Obama chose a poor metric for measuring past administrations. To make his point with jobs data, he has to point to his own numbers and completely disavow much of them, or else ignore public-sector losses. We came close to thinking this was worth Three Pinocchios, but ultimately decided he was not necessarily including his record in the statement. Still, it’s a very fine line. The president should be much more careful about making such a sweeping claim.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/obamas-remarks-on-worst-job-growth-did-he-end-it-or-should-he-own-it/2012/05/18/gIQAkDKCZU_blog.html

here ya go, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

have a good day

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/03/us-usa-economy-instant-idUSBRE8920KT20121003

(Reuters) - Private employers added 162,000 jobs in September, topping economists' expectations, a report by a payrolls processor showed on Wednesday.

Rogue wrote:[img][/img]

The COWH has used this before.....'LEAD FROM BEHIND'...which also indicates where their heads are placed...

Bush's Budget Blunders (in-depth review of Bush's pathetic economic record, which led directly to where we are today).

http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1872229_1872230_1872231,00.html

-------------------------------

http://crooksandliars.com/jon-perr/10-epic-failures-of-the-bush-tax-cuts

Floridatexan wrote:
Bush's Budget Blunders (in-depth review of Bush's pathetic economic record, which led directly to where we are today).

http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1872229_1872230_1872231,00.html

-------------------------------

http://crooksandliars.com/jon-perr/10-epic-failures-of-the-bush-tax-cuts

youre going to have to get in line with the rest of those who cant seem to make up thier minds if its congress at fault or the prez see.

because if its congress to blame for why obama is failing then be prepared to admit that the 2006-2010 dem congress caused the recession. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Markle wrote: I take it that you realize it takes 150,000 new jobs per month, just to keep even with population growth.

Well?

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

"Total employment rose by 873,000 in September, following 3 months of little
change."

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

Non-adjusted job gains from the Establishment Survey is +574,000 jobs.