Tellthetruth wrote: SheWrites wrote:
Yes there are. Many of these came after the fact. It's been investigated and no charges.
The trail of accusations against Hillary always comes up short. No one is that powerful to slip out of the bounds of the law that many times.
I refer to my previous post on another thread about men who do not want a strong woman as leader of the country.
Wrong of "after the fact." When you are given a clearance to handle confidential, secret and TS/SCI (special access programs) information you are given briefs on how to do this properly and sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) and it list the penalties for even accidental errors. For nearly all people, it permanently denies access to such ever again and bars you from continuing to keep your clearances. Wrong on "after the fact" as when you are "read into" SAP programs, you get more briefs and sign another NDA. That happens for each SAP you are required to have access to. I've been read into some of the same programs that Hillary has been read into both at initial onset of my schooling at Goodfellow AFB and into the career field for each advanced training which pertains to the unit I have been assigned to.
Wrong on she was investigated and found not guilty. Comey specifically said she had violated multiple rules and regulations regarding the handling of the aforementioned information. She was not under oath when asked though. Comey, under questioning by Trey Gowdy, even admitted that in the investigation of Hillary done by the Benghazi Committee, what was told to that committee and what the FBI found out in many circumstances was not the truth. Markle has some of that info in his signature on his posts if you need your memory refreshed. The difference is this....Hillary was not under OATH by the FBI in their kid gloves treatment of her thus far. HOR member Jason Cheffetz specifically asked Comey why wasn't she charged and he stated that those were not the things he was looking for in his investigation and that another request had to be submitted for the FBI to investigate her House testimony compared to what the FBI found out:
a) that she had a private server that was insecure and had C,S, and TS/SCI on it
b) that she never sent emails with C.S, or TS/SCI content to others who may or may not have the clearance to accept and that the messages were not sent in the proper SIPR program.
c) that she didn't know if something was C, S, or TS/SCI when it was marked as such
d) that she had only one device that she inappropriately used to send/ receive C, S, and TS/SCI information on- she had as many as 23
All of those statements said to the House Investigative committee were determined to be false according to the FBI. Bad news for her as the testimony given in that arena WAS UNDER OATH.
Nobody could care less about a person's gender if they can competently do the job assigned. My last flight commander before moving to the flight I am in now was a female Major. She is a strong and competent leader and will most likely pick up Lt Col below the zone which means she will get her own command in the long run, maybe before she actually pins on her rank.
Hillary's accusations against her are never fully investigated or the people tied to the investigation end up missing or dead (coincidence?) for more than two and a half decades. Go figure nothing has stuck to her. Hard for a prosecution to make a case when the star witness gets a dirt nap.
You voted for the African American guy just because you wanted to make history and you are taking the same tangent with Hillary because of her gender. Has that worked out for you the last seven years and eight months?