ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Markle spins propaganda, and puts great effort into it, even though much of it could be written by a pimply-faced high school student. A very important election is looming in November, and I have a feeling someone is going to be left holding the bag. I want to see the looks of Markle's and PaceDog's faces the day after the election.
Personally I don't consider cutting and pasting from hard core right wing propaganda putting "great effort" into anything except attempting to plaster the forum with negativism, arrogant disrespect, and, often, thinly veiled hatred. Further, to me, trying to have a reasoned discussion with Markle is like tilting at windmills -- it's useless, a complete and utter waste of my precious time on this Earth, accomplishing absolutely zero, zilch, nada, niente - NOTHING, and I don't fool myself by ever thinking otherwise.
Oh, wait - it actually does accomplish something, as witnessed by the posters here who think this forum is "boring" without the rabid contentiousness factor fomented by Markle, which only serves to further the same inter-personal meanness and nastiness that so many in our society lap up today as though it were honey. It's all part of the disintegration of courtesy and of our national unity, as we've discussed before and will again.
So how about some action to fight all that for a change, instead of welcoming it out of some misguided fear of "censorship"?
As for the look on Markle's face after a possible Democratic victory, I suggest no one hold your breath if you expect to see anything other than a face that hardens further and immediately conjures ways to insult, denigrate, dehumanize, disrespect and slander our new president, WHOEVER that may be as long as it isn't a Republican or conservative by his own standards. Mark my words.
Yep, that's all you're gonna get from your Mr. Markle, who loves nothing better than twisting the knife into whomever he thinks he's besting at the moment, despite his attempts to appear godly. His supposed "prayers" for everyone here are pure hypocrisy
. Does he really think that a few words aimed at the sky can fix all the damage he does here daily, aligning himself with the forces of political darkness and crowing with pride at his empty "victories" over those who don't waste their time attempting to respond to his narrow-minded attacks on anything and anyone even vaguely liberal?
I realize I'm still only newly returned to this forum and my voice therefore doesn't count for much with many of you, but I'm going to be brutally frank here and say that I'm actually surprised and disappointed that so many of you seem to think it's fun to spar with this person. You do realize you can never win in the least, right? No, not even Seaoat can prevail. When was the last time anyone here saw Markle concede even the tiniest point? Are you kidding me?? When did Markle ever light a candle in the room?
And if some of you are concerned about censorship -despite Boards' valid point about censorship vs. pure spam - well, maybe there needs to be a separate forum where Markle can spew his venomous spam all day long and those who either lap it up and believe it, or else simply love uselessly attempting to counter his hate-filled darkness, can duke it out to their hearts' content.
In fact maybe Markle himself could do the work to set it up, sponsor and monitor it. That would be about as meaningful as anything happening here where he's concerned.
And with that I'm sure I'm going to get dumped on just as Boards has been here. So be it. I, for one, declare my support for Boards, and wish some of you who have voted for him on this poll would also speak up.
Here's the bottom line for me: Markle and Markle alone is the one factor that makes me think more often than not that I probably shouldn't be participating on this forum. And no, it's not because I only want to surround myself with like-minded individuals. There are plenty of conservatives here who are perfectly capable of carrying on reasonable and reasoned discussion, even when occasionally angry and impassioned, whereas, at least for me, Markle's reactionary nastiness only serves to diminish the validity and import of that same discussion
OK, I'm done. Have at me, if you will. Contrary to Markle's high-handed judgment of me, I'm nothing if not honest. And yeah, Markle, this post is LONG, but it doesn't begin
to take up the forum space your constant cut-and-pastes do.