Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Can any republican lay out an alternative to the Iran deal?

+3
ZVUGKTUBM
2seaoat
boards of FL
7 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

I always knew semi-demented poster Markle was lost in space; however, now I also think there might be others orbiting too far from the sun.

Talk is really cheap, and we know that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad uttered a lot of firey rhetoric; however actions speak louder than words. Israel has never been attacked directly by Iran--that is a fact--no matter what Ahmadinejad "says".

I give President Obama three thumbs up for refusing to listen to those calling for war against Iran. If the Republican-controlled Congress and Senate try to stop the deal with what will be a very partisan-slanted vote, I hope he vetoes the snot out of it.

I wish former presidents Johnson and Nixon had used the same pressures against Israel when they were developing the bomb and began building a nuclear arsenal back in the late 1960s.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:
boards of FL wrote:So...still no alternative to the Iran deal?

How?

Semi-retired President Obama started the collapse when he took office and went on his world wide apology tour.  Showing the world he was weak in ineffective.

Now he has gotten us to a point where our enemies don't respect or fear us and our supposed friends can't trust us.

Now President Obama has caved for Iran, Cuba and ISIS.

President Obama goes out of his way to circumvent the checks and balances dictated in our Constitution.

So why make any proposal.  Like ObamaCare, let it crash and burn.

Your worthless propaganda is so damn silly....

Can any republican lay out an alternative to the Iran deal? - Page 2 Fail_210



Last edited by ZVUGKTUBM on 7/21/2015, 8:36 pm; edited 1 time in total

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

2seaoat



Did you say something?

Yes, I said blustery bufoonery from real estate people may help sell homes, but it does not make tough guys, or by osmosis give insight into how international affairs should be conducted.....You and Donald share that tough guy bufoonery thinking that you can brand toughness and respect.....again it is earned, not sold like an amenity to a home being sold by suzie salesperson....oh, you just have to have a Florida room, and did I say location....location.....location.  Next thing you know we will have a used car salesman running this country.

President Obama has shown restraint, patience, intelligence and mental toughness which has brought unprecedented success to American policy.  Your and Mr. Trump's bluster should be saved on puffing a piece of real estate........its  huuuuuuuuuuggggggggggggge.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

2seaoat wrote:Yes, I said blustery bufoonery from real estate people may help sell homes, but it does not make tough guys, or by osmosis give insight into how international affairs should be conducted.....

Can any republican lay out an alternative to the Iran deal? - Page 2 Chairm10

They should stick to selling Florida swampland......

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
The Man Comes Around wrote:Walk away from the negotiation table and tell the rest of the world; especially Europe, Russia, China, and India; it's their problem.

That way the money we save, like the $50 billion that Obama wants to give Iran, can be used on infrastructure instead.

*****BOARDS THE IDIOT*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral




(sprays air freshener)


Smells like the shit you've been spraying for years.

*****THEN YOU WONDER WHY IT SMELLS LIKE A PIGSTY IN HERE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:So is that it then?  There isn't one republican here who can lay out a realistic alternative to the Iran deal?  The best submission out of the entire lot is to steal $50 billion from Iran and put that towards our infrastructure?  

The term 'low information voter' comes to mind.

How is it stealing $50 billion from Iran if the money belongs to the United States in the first place?

*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Last edited by The Man Comes Around on 7/21/2015, 11:59 pm; edited 1 time in total

EmeraldGhost

EmeraldGhost

boards of FL wrote:I have heard alot of complaining but no alternatives.  Are there any?  Feel free to lay them out here and make the case for the Republican alternative to the Iran deal.

Yeah ... keep the pressure on. They came to the table once because it was starting to really hurt. They'll be back with more concessions when it starts to hurt more.


(in any case ... I don't think the Iranian populace in general are a bunch of crazies, they are fairly sane & mostly well-educated compared to some other Middle Eastern countries .... and especially compared to, say, Pakistan. It wouldn't be the end of the world if they did manage to develop a few nukes. The USA & Iran could get along famously with some slight changes in leadership in Iran.)

Guest


Guest

Snark Spigot wrote:
boards of FL wrote:So is that it then?  There isn't one republican here who can lay out a realistic alternative to the Iran deal?  The best submission out of the entire lot is to steal $50 billion from Iran and put that towards our infrastructure?  

The term 'low information voter' comes to mind.

The problem for the Repukes is that there is no realistic alternative.

They have no earthly idea how to put of positive spin on the prospect of war with Iran, nor can they provide a rational scenario whereby the United States could unilaterally apply enough pressure to force a regime change in Iran or abandonment of their nuclear ambitions.

So, you get idiocy like the word salad DE puked on this thread or random internet guy pretending that the goal of the agreement is the exact opposite of reality.

That's all they can muster.

If we're going to go ahead and let Iran build nuclear capability then what's the point of negotiating? NONE! Let them do it without $50 billion US taxpayer dollars and let the rest of the world worry about the issue.

*****YA FUCKING IDIOT*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Last edited by The Man Comes Around on 7/21/2015, 11:23 pm; edited 1 time in total

Guest


Guest

Isn't it funny how progressives say we should get out of the affairs of other foreign nations, like Iran, then when someone suggests that the United States should just walk out of negotiations and tell the rest of the world it's their problem suddenly it's very important to the progressives for the United States to be involved?

*****FUCKING CONVOLUTEDLY HILARIOUS!*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral

Guest


Guest

Oh that's right! Without the $50 billion payoff to Iran there won't be any contributions to certain foundations in the United States from anonymous foreign sources.

Wouldn't want to stop lining the pockets of the 1% who are already wealthy with US taxpayer dollars in a round about way now would we.

*****FUCKING PROGRESSIVE HYPOCRISY AT IT'S FINEST*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral

boards of FL

boards of FL

EmeraldGhost wrote:
boards of FL wrote:I have heard alot of complaining but no alternatives.  Are there any?  Feel free to lay them out here and make the case for the Republican alternative to the Iran deal.

Yeah ... keep the pressure on.   They came to the table once because it was starting to really hurt.   They'll be back with more concessions when it starts to hurt more.



We don't have that luxury. Our allies are doing us a favor at the expense of their economies in joining us in these Iran sanctions. We can't expect them (and they won't) to continue on that path indefinitely, particularly if we had a deal right in front of us and walked away.

Simply staying the course is not an option either.


_________________
I approve this message.

boards of FL

boards of FL

The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:So is that it then?  There isn't one republican here who can lay out a realistic alternative to the Iran deal?  The best submission out of the entire lot is to steal $50 billion from Iran and put that towards our infrastructure?  

The term 'low information voter' comes to mind.

How is it stealing $50 billion from Iran if the money belongs to the United States in the first place?

*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Because the money doesn't belong to the United States in the first place.  It is Iran's own money and assets that have been frozen through sanctions.

You should probably read at least enough to have a faint clue as to what you're talking about before stating your opinion so confidently.

Sorry for quoting him, everyone.  (Sprays air freshener)


The Man Comes Around wrote:*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****



Actually, this is an example of low information voter ignorance.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-suggests-compromise-on-iran-sanctions-1429308388

The Obama administration estimates Iran has between $100 billion and $140 billion of its oil revenue frozen in offshore accounts as a result of sanctions. U.S. officials said they expect Tehran to gain access to these funds in phases as part of a final deal. Iran could receive somewhere between $30 billion and $50 billion upon signing the agreement, said congressional officials briefed by the administration.


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:So is that it then?  There isn't one republican here who can lay out a realistic alternative to the Iran deal?  The best submission out of the entire lot is to steal $50 billion from Iran and put that towards our infrastructure?  

The term 'low information voter' comes to mind.

How is it stealing $50 billion from Iran if the money belongs to the United States in the first place?

*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Because the money doesn't belong to the United States in the first place.  It is Iran's own money and assets that have been frozen through sanctions.

You should probably read at least enough to have a faint clue as to what you're talking about before stating your opinion so confidently.

Sorry for quoting him, everyone.  (Sprays air freshener)


The Man Comes Around wrote:*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****



Actually, this is an example of low information voter ignorance.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-suggests-compromise-on-iran-sanctions-1429308388

The Obama administration estimates Iran has between $100 billion and $140 billion of its oil revenue frozen in offshore accounts as a result of sanctions. U.S. officials said they expect Tehran to gain access to these funds in phases as part of a final deal. Iran could receive somewhere between $30 billion and $50 billion upon signing the agreement, said congressional officials briefed by the administration.

Then we need to give them their money back and pull the fuck out of the negotiations. Let the rest of the world worry about them.

*****GO FUCK YOURSELF*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral

boards of FL

boards of FL

The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:So is that it then?  There isn't one republican here who can lay out a realistic alternative to the Iran deal?  The best submission out of the entire lot is to steal $50 billion from Iran and put that towards our infrastructure?  

The term 'low information voter' comes to mind.

How is it stealing $50 billion from Iran if the money belongs to the United States in the first place?

*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Because the money doesn't belong to the United States in the first place.  It is Iran's own money and assets that have been frozen through sanctions.

You should probably read at least enough to have a faint clue as to what you're talking about before stating your opinion so confidently.

Sorry for quoting him, everyone.  (Sprays air freshener)


The Man Comes Around wrote:*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****



Actually, this is an example of low information voter ignorance.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-suggests-compromise-on-iran-sanctions-1429308388

The Obama administration estimates Iran has between $100 billion and $140 billion of its oil revenue frozen in offshore accounts as a result of sanctions. U.S. officials said they expect Tehran to gain access to these funds in phases as part of a final deal. Iran could receive somewhere between $30 billion and $50 billion upon signing the agreement, said congressional officials briefed by the administration.

Then we need to give them their money back and pull the fuck out of the negotiations. Let the rest of the world worry about them.

*****GO FUCK YOURSELF*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Does anyone need any more proof that our forum republicans are of the low information voter brand?.

Out of the entire lot of them, this is their alternative to the Iran deal.


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:So is that it then?  There isn't one republican here who can lay out a realistic alternative to the Iran deal?  The best submission out of the entire lot is to steal $50 billion from Iran and put that towards our infrastructure?  

The term 'low information voter' comes to mind.

How is it stealing $50 billion from Iran if the money belongs to the United States in the first place?

*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Because the money doesn't belong to the United States in the first place.  It is Iran's own money and assets that have been frozen through sanctions.

You should probably read at least enough to have a faint clue as to what you're talking about before stating your opinion so confidently.

Sorry for quoting him, everyone.  (Sprays air freshener)


The Man Comes Around wrote:*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****



Actually, this is an example of low information voter ignorance.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-suggests-compromise-on-iran-sanctions-1429308388

The Obama administration estimates Iran has between $100 billion and $140 billion of its oil revenue frozen in offshore accounts as a result of sanctions. U.S. officials said they expect Tehran to gain access to these funds in phases as part of a final deal. Iran could receive somewhere between $30 billion and $50 billion upon signing the agreement, said congressional officials briefed by the administration.

Then we need to give them their money back and pull the fuck out of the negotiations. Let the rest of the world worry about them.

*****GO FUCK YOURSELF*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Does anyone need any more proof that our forum republicans are of the low information voter brand?

Who says I'm a Republican you stupid cockroach eating shit head?

Fuck!!!!! Talk about low information voters perhaps you should read some of your own progressive agenda about how interfering in other countries affairs in none of the United States business dumb ass.

But then a fart brained squid faced afterbirth like you only cares what the masters at the top think don't you?

*****GO FUCK A DUCK*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral

boards of FL

boards of FL

The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
The Man Comes Around wrote:
boards of FL wrote:So is that it then?  There isn't one republican here who can lay out a realistic alternative to the Iran deal?  The best submission out of the entire lot is to steal $50 billion from Iran and put that towards our infrastructure?  

The term 'low information voter' comes to mind.

How is it stealing $50 billion from Iran if the money belongs to the United States in the first place?

*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Because the money doesn't belong to the United States in the first place.  It is Iran's own money and assets that have been frozen through sanctions.

You should probably read at least enough to have a faint clue as to what you're talking about before stating your opinion so confidently.

Sorry for quoting him, everyone.  (Sprays air freshener)


The Man Comes Around wrote:*****OH THAT's RIGHT! THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF PROGRESSIVE LOGIC*****



Actually, this is an example of low information voter ignorance.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-suggests-compromise-on-iran-sanctions-1429308388

The Obama administration estimates Iran has between $100 billion and $140 billion of its oil revenue frozen in offshore accounts as a result of sanctions. U.S. officials said they expect Tehran to gain access to these funds in phases as part of a final deal. Iran could receive somewhere between $30 billion and $50 billion upon signing the agreement, said congressional officials briefed by the administration.

Then we need to give them their money back and pull the fuck out of the negotiations. Let the rest of the world worry about them.

*****GO FUCK YOURSELF*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



Does anyone need any more proof that our forum republicans are of the low information voter brand?

Who says I'm a Republican you stupid cockroach eating shit head?

Fuck!!!!! Talk about low information voters perhaps you should read some of your own progressive agenda about how interfering in other countries affairs in none of the United States business dumb ass.

But then a fart brained squid faced afterbirth like you only cares what the masters at the top think don't you?

*****GO FUCK A DUCK*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral



The republican base, everyone!   Making up policy as they go without any knowledge of the underlying facts or fundamentals.  And when they get called out on that, they respond as quoted above.

Incapable of learning. Incapable of adjusting their opinions upon gaining new information. Incapable of coming off as even remotely competent.

GOP 2016, everyone!  GOP 2016!


Can any republican lay out an alternative to the Iran deal? - Page 2 Giphy


_________________
I approve this message.

Sal

Sal

Please stop quoting him.

It's hurting my brain and destroying what's left of my faith in humanity.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:


The republican base, everyone!   Making up policy as they go without any knowledge of the underlying facts or fundamentals.  And when they get called out on that, they respond as quoted above.  

Incapable of learning.  Incapable of adjusting their opinions upon gaining new information.  Incapable of coming off as even remotely competent.

GOP 2016, everyone!  GOP 2016!


Can any republican lay out an alternative to the Iran deal? - Page 2 Giphy

Reading comprehension? Who said I was Republican?

Incapable of adjusting? I adjusted my opinion. I said give the money back since it's theirs and then walk away from the discussion telling the rest of the world it's their problem.

Yes I know you think you're so much better than anyone that doesn't share your opinion. That's why you keep a reading comprehension link handy and have people that will blindly follow what you have to say to back you up. That's also why you felt the need to sneak around 'replacing' things, something no one else can do, if you become irritated with someone; or lock up a thread because you have no desire to discuss an issue any more.


*****NULL FACE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA

Neutral

boards of FL

boards of FL

Let's all have a moment of silence for Damaged Eagle who - in a display of butthurt similar to that which we have seen in the past from PkrBum and gatorfan - has deleted his account.


_________________
I approve this message.

Sal

Sal

I thought it smelled better in here today.

boards of FL

boards of FL

Snark Spigot wrote:I thought it smelled better in here today.


Can any republican lay out an alternative to the Iran deal? - Page 2 Obama-laughing


_________________
I approve this message.

Sal

Sal

I guess he's "The Man Who Doesn't Come Around Anymore", now?

gatorfan



Snark Spigot wrote:I thought it smelled better in here today.

I don't know about that - still smells like a bunch of BoFshit.......

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum