Wordslinger wrote:Markle wrote:Wordslinger wrote:KarlRove wrote:Wordslinger wrote:KarlRove wrote:You're still here posting with your noggin' intact....guess that answers your question dork.
Get real War Hero. Isis has murdered maybe a thousand or more Iraqis during takeovers of various towns.
The U.S. murdered (by way of "collateral" damage), hundreds of thousands of noncombatant Iraqis.
Isis meant to kill their victims.
Whether we did, or didn't doesn't make any difference to the victims!!
Reality!
Nobody knows how many ISIS has killed chickenboy. Of course, you could always volunteer to be their statistician. I'll buy your ticket over. Hopefully, you will get a taste of what they are really like.
Thanks for making my point War Hero -- it really is hard to know who has killed the most Iraqis -- the USA or ISIS. And, as I remember, you wrote that God was on our side ....with her for a friend who needs an enemy?
You left out Saddam Hussein, who outdid all combined.
Do you have any credible statistics to support that claim? I thought not ...
You are becoming an incredibly great foil! You're coming close to your good friend 2seaoat!
Unlike you and your other far left Progressive comrades, I actually HAVE facts to support my points. Something you know all too well.
IRAQ: Deaths under Saddam Hussein
Tom Grey answers David Crow's request the empirical basis for his statement on the number of dead under Saddam Hussein. "See http://www.gbn.org/ArticleDisplayServlet.srv?aid=2400&msp=1242 Here is an excerpt:":Along with other human rights organizations, The Documental Centre for Human Rights in Iraq has compiled documentation on over 600,000 civilian executions in Iraq. Human Rights Watch reports that in one operation alone, the Anfal, Saddam killed 100,000 Kurdish Iraqis. Another 500,000 are estimated to have died in Saddam's needless war with Iran. Coldly taken as a daily average for the 24 years of Saddam's reign, these numbers give us a horrifying picture of between 70 and 125 civilian deaths per day for every one of Saddam's 8,000-odd days in power"
But such facts are not enough -- because for him the true question is whether civilians killed by the war are "unnecessary". I need to ask whether he thinks the civilian deaths were necessary or not. I clearly believe they were necessary to oust Saddam and save the lives he would have murdered, to free the children from prison, etc. -- in fact more necessary than the atomic bombs to force Japan's surrender If Mr. Crow is willing to accept Muslim fanatic terrorists with WMDs, or Muslim theocracy, rather than fight for Western/ Christian/ Capitalist/ Freedom, then indeed comparing death rates doesn't mean much".
Ronald Hilton - 4/25/03