A great idea for solving America's battle with young African American men!

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:What is your solution to the problem of black Americans growing up in one parent households, in urban centers where male unemployment exceeds 50%?

What is the incentive for a black boy to study hard if no jobs are available after graduation?

And your record as an absent Dad who pays his child support is about as relevant to this conversation as a discussion of retirement programs to a man hanging onto a life ring in the ocean, surrounded by sharks.

ANOTHER LIE from our uninformed far left Socialist/Communist good friend Wordslinger.

Screaming again, heaven only knows why, Wordslinger tells us that an educated black man cannot get a job.

Tell us Wordslinger, what is the unemployment rate for a black man or woman with a bachelor's degree?

Step up my good man, give us the FACTS!  Don't be shy now.  We know you can do it!

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:The proper object of war is to defeat an enemy and then control the destiny of the defeated nation so they are no longer a threat.

We lost in Vietnam.

We lost in Iraq.

We're losing in Afghanistan.

We're losing in Yemen.

We're losing in Libya.

At no point in our illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq did we resolve the tribal differences that create conflict between the Sunnis, shiias and Kurds.

With considerably more boots on the ground than we could afford, for a duration of decades, we might have controlled the three conflictive peoples who populate Iraq.

And it would have broken our own country.

Do you really expect us to believe your crapola that we "won" in Iraq?

You're a much bigger fool than I thought ... LOL

What the President Johnson Vietnam war has to do with this, I have no clue.  We lost because it was on TV.  Had WWII had as much TV coverage, you'd have lost that one for us too.  No, we lost in Vietnam because the American people never considered the North Vietnamese a real threat to our country.

As for Iraq, here is what your Progressives said about the victory.

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.
-  Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."
- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going?  How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President?  Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,400 American fatalities.  Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.  The war Obama fought in Iraq and in Afghanistan were wars he inherited.  Neither one of them was necessary to protect the safety of Americans.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Is45Jwqizc

Why do you constantly lie about simple to find FACTS?

Since I don't lie about facts, I have no response to your bullshit accusation.

Re: A great idea for solving America's battle with young African American men! Yesterday at 11:02 pm

Wordslinger

Posts: 3747
Join date: 2012-06-23
Location: Pace

The proper object of war is to defeat an enemy and then control the destiny of the defeated nation so they are no longer a threat.

We lost in Iraq.

That's a lie.  As you well know.

You added this to my quote:   The war Obama fought in Iraq and in Afghanistan were wars he inherited.  Neither one of them was necessary to protect the safety of Americans.  

That too is a lie.

Seems that it just comes natural to you doesn't it?  

Wordslinger wrote:Thus far I haven't found a single reason why the CCC idea wouldn't work.
Hello?

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:The proper object of war is to defeat an enemy and then control the destiny of the defeated nation so they are no longer a threat.

We lost in Vietnam.

We lost in Iraq.

We're losing in Afghanistan.

We're losing in Yemen.

We're losing in Libya.

At no point in our illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq did we resolve the tribal differences that create conflict between the Sunnis, shiias and Kurds.

With considerably more boots on the ground than we could afford, for a duration of decades, we might have controlled the three conflictive peoples who populate Iraq.

And it would have broken our own country.

Do you really expect us to believe your crapola that we "won" in Iraq?

You're a much bigger fool than I thought ... LOL

What the President Johnson Vietnam war has to do with this, I have no clue.  We lost because it was on TV.  Had WWII had as much TV coverage, you'd have lost that one for us too.  No, we lost in Vietnam because the American people never considered the North Vietnamese a real threat to our country.

As for Iraq, here is what your Progressives said about the victory.

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.
-  Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."
- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going?  How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President?  Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,400 American fatalities.  Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.  The war Obama fought in Iraq and in Afghanistan were wars he inherited.  Neither one of them was necessary to protect the safety of Americans.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Is45Jwqizc

Why do you constantly lie about simple to find FACTS?

Since I don't lie about facts, I have no response to your bullshit accusation.

Re: A great idea for solving America's battle with young African American men! Yesterday at 11:02 pm

Wordslinger

Posts: 3747
Join date: 2012-06-23
Location: Pace

The proper object of war is to defeat an enemy and then control the destiny of the defeated nation so they are no longer a threat.

We lost in Iraq.

That's a lie.  As you well know.

You added this to my quote:   The war Obama fought in Iraq and in Afghanistan were wars he inherited.  Neither one of them was necessary to protect the safety of Americans.  

That too is a lie.

Seems that it just comes natural to you doesn't it?  

that and a buck or two will get you a cup of coffee ... LOL

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:What is your solution to the problem of black Americans growing up in one parent households, in urban centers where male unemployment exceeds 50%?

What is the incentive for a black boy to study hard if no jobs are available after graduation?

And your record as an absent Dad who pays his child support is about as relevant to this conversation as a discussion of retirement programs to a man hanging onto a life ring in the ocean, surrounded by sharks.

ANOTHER LIE from our uninformed far left Socialist/Communist good friend Wordslinger.

Screaming again, heaven only knows why, Wordslinger tells us that an educated black man cannot get a job.

Tell us Wordslinger, what is the unemployment rate for a black man or woman with a bachelor's degree?

Step up my good man, give us the FACTS!  Don't be shy now.  We know you can do it!

I never said "college degree."  I meant a high school graduate.
Reality.  Tell us Semi-sane Markle, what percent of the young black men living in downtown Baltimore have graduated high school?.

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:What is your solution to the problem of black Americans growing up in one parent households, in urban centers where male unemployment exceeds 50%?

What is the incentive for a black boy to study hard if no jobs are available after graduation?

And your record as an absent Dad who pays his child support is about as relevant to this conversation as a discussion of retirement programs to a man hanging onto a life ring in the ocean, surrounded by sharks.

ANOTHER LIE from our uninformed far left Socialist/Communist good friend Wordslinger.

Screaming again, heaven only knows why, Wordslinger tells us that an educated black man cannot get a job.

Tell us Wordslinger, what is the unemployment rate for a black man or woman with a bachelor's degree?

Step up my good man, give us the FACTS!  Don't be shy now.  We know you can do it!

I never said "college degree."  I meant a high school graduate.
Reality.  Tell us Semi-sane Markle, what percent of the young black men living in downtown Baltimore have graduated high school?.

Perhaps you are unaware that tax payers paid $1.8 BILLION in "stimulus" money to Baltimore.  One of the main, so called recipients, education.  Result...little or nothing.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:What is your solution to the problem of black Americans growing up in one parent households, in urban centers where male unemployment exceeds 50%?

What is the incentive for a black boy to study hard if no jobs are available after graduation?

And your record as an absent Dad who pays his child support is about as relevant to this conversation as a discussion of retirement programs to a man hanging onto a life ring in the ocean, surrounded by sharks.

ANOTHER LIE from our uninformed far left Socialist/Communist good friend Wordslinger.

Screaming again, heaven only knows why, Wordslinger tells us that an educated black man cannot get a job.

Tell us Wordslinger, what is the unemployment rate for a black man or woman with a bachelor's degree?

Step up my good man, give us the FACTS!  Don't be shy now.  We know you can do it!

I never said "college degree."  I meant a high school graduate.
Reality.  Tell us Semi-sane Markle, what percent of the young black men living in downtown Baltimore have graduated high school?.

Perhaps you are unaware that tax payers paid $1.8 BILLION in "stimulus" money to Baltimore.  One of the main, so called recipients, education.  Result...little or nothing.

You never heard me root for more money to be invested in education. Not once.  And why have you not been able to look up and show us your brilliance by announcing the percent of young black men from Baltimore who did graduate from high school?

Tell us your perspective -- you know, the one promulgated by the bloodsucking corporations that you worship -- of what needs to be done to solve the problem of unemployed and undereducated young black men living in ghettos of poverty in urban centers.  It's clear from your eccentric and fascistic commentary which virtually always attacks anything left of Attila the Hun, that you're absolutely incapable of bringing forth any idea that might correct or improve a faulty situation.

Reality!

Wordslinger wrote:

SheWrites wrote:Don't mess with my mild duds.  

Hey, it is what it is and like I said...it's across the board.

You brought up some interesting points.  Let me ask you, what are the elements necessary to instill in a child the desire to contribute and work towards desirable goals?

Where does the "drive to work" and achieve come from?

Inborn?  Environmental?

I'm all ears ...

Wordslinger wrote:Crickets?  I thought so!

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Crickets?  I thought so!

I work for a living.

Wordslinger wrote:Thus far I haven't found a single reason why the CCC idea wouldn't work.
Hello?

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Crickets?  I thought so!

I work for a living.

What pray tell has that got to do with the subject?  Too much prozac!

Markle wrote:

2seaoat wrote:the black family unit was one of the strongest in the United States.

How as a social scientist do you measure the strength of a family unit?  Do you enjoy pulling pure bull Chit out of thin air or are you really this confused?

You, Wordslinger and your other comrades have been taught this before.  Why do you all prefer to feign ignorance?

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Thus far I haven't found a single reason why the CCC idea wouldn't work.
Hello?

Are you referring to the Civilian Conservation Corps?

If you are, or whatever it is, you should be more clear.  Many people would like to forget the failed social policies of the administration of FDR.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Thus far I haven't found a single reason why the CCC idea wouldn't work.
Hello?

Are you referring to the Civilian Conservation Corps?

If you are, or whatever it is, you should be more clear.  Many people would like to forget the failed social policies of the administration of FDR.

The only people who consider the WPA and CCC projects that Roosevelt brought forward a failure, are fascist bastards, like yourself, who much prefer that when the economy fails (the causes of which are almost always the product of greedy, bloodsucking moves by the ultra rich) that nothing at all should be done to help the millions who have been forced to wait each day in long soup lines, in order to survive.

Fortunately, because of their arrogant and snotty attitudes and their ridiculous lying, they have little if any powers to persuade rational, decent people to their points of view.  They do, however, provide a constant stream of laughable input . . .  

Reality!

Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.  Benito Mussolini[/b][/i][/i]

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Thus far I haven't found a single reason why the CCC idea wouldn't work.
Hello?

Are you referring to the Civilian Conservation Corps?

If you are, or whatever it is, you should be more clear.  Many people would like to forget the failed social policies of the administration of FDR.

The only people who consider the WPA and CCC projects that Roosevelt brought forward a failure, are fascist bastards, like yourself, who much prefer that when the economy fails (the causes of which are almost always the product of greedy, bloodsucking moves by the ultra rich) that nothing at all should be done to help the millions who have been forced to wait each day in long soup lines, in order to survive.

Fortunately, because of their arrogant and snotty attitudes and their ridiculous lying, they have little if any powers to persuade rational, decent people to their points of view.  They do, however, provide a constant stream of laughable input . . .  

Reality!

Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.  Benito Mussolini[/b][/i][/i]

Yes, and as we well know, it was FDR whose policies extended the Great Depression by SEVEN YEARS or more.

KarlRove wrote:And not let their baby mommas have to live off welfare and wic/snap

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Thus far I haven't found a single reason why the CCC idea wouldn't work.
Hello?

Are you referring to the Civilian Conservation Corps?

If you are, or whatever it is, you should be more clear.  Many people would like to forget the failed social policies of the administration of FDR.

The only people who consider the WPA and CCC projects that Roosevelt brought forward a failure, are fascist bastards, like yourself, who much prefer that when the economy fails (the causes of which are almost always the product of greedy, bloodsucking moves by the ultra rich) that nothing at all should be done to help the millions who have been forced to wait each day in long soup lines, in order to survive.

Fortunately, because of their arrogant and snotty attitudes and their ridiculous lying, they have little if any powers to persuade rational, decent people to their points of view.  They do, however, provide a constant stream of laughable input . . .  

Reality!

Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.  Benito Mussolini[/b][/i][/i]

Yes, and as we well know, it was FDR whose policies extended the Great Depression by SEVEN YEARS or more.

Sure Roosevelt's policies extended the Great Depression.  And up is down, and wet is dry, and hot is cool, and like your head, full is empty.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:Thus far I haven't found a single reason why the CCC idea wouldn't work.
Hello?

Are you referring to the Civilian Conservation Corps?

If you are, or whatever it is, you should be more clear.  Many people would like to forget the failed social policies of the administration of FDR.

The only people who consider the WPA and CCC projects that Roosevelt brought forward a failure, are fascist bastards, like yourself, who much prefer that when the economy fails (the causes of which are almost always the product of greedy, bloodsucking moves by the ultra rich) that nothing at all should be done to help the millions who have been forced to wait each day in long soup lines, in order to survive.

Fortunately, because of their arrogant and snotty attitudes and their ridiculous lying, they have little if any powers to persuade rational, decent people to their points of view.  They do, however, provide a constant stream of laughable input . . .  

Reality!

Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.  Benito Mussolini

Yes, and as we well know, it was FDR whose policies extended the Great Depression by SEVEN YEARS or more.

Sure Roosevelt's policies extended the Great Depression.  And up is down, and wet is dry, and hot is cool, and like your head, full is empty.